You will spot a grunt when they claim Jesus is not a Hebrew name but an English name. They are so dumb. But then pigs are not known for a lot of intelligence.
Recently a young UPC man wrote me that Jesus was not the name of Jesus since that was an English name. He demanded I give him the Paleo-Hebrew name for Jesus. So, I asked him politely to provide me the Paleo-Hebrew letter symbols for the name of Jesus and I would transliterate them for him. I asked him to document Jesus had a Paleo-Hebrew name. I went a step further and asked him to document his parents Joseph and Mary had Paleo-Hebrew names. I told him not to come back with Babylonian Aramaic from James Strong's Chaldee (Babylonian)/Greek lexicon/dictionary.
He soon saw his stupidity but came back with Aramaic anyway. He refused to document his alleged existence of a Paleo-Hebrew name for Jesus. He could not document the Paleo-Hebrew names for Joseph and Mary. He made the statement that logically, all Jews and Hebrews would have Paleo-Hebrew names because their race was Hebrew. That is insane. There are hundreds of non-Hebrew names in the Bible. And there were thousands of Jews and Israelites who did not not have Hebrew names. So his logic about logically all Jews would have a Paleo-Hebrew name had no credibility.
The name of Jesus was upon the Cross in Latin, Hebrew, and Greek. This one name was phonetically written in the letter symbols of three languages. What many liars do not want, is for all three transliterations to have the same or near the same phonetic pronunciation. This is where the lie originates that Jesus is not a Hebrew name. It starts with the letters in the name of Jesus being transcribed from Paleo-Hebrew into Latin and Greek. They tell the lie that once this is done the name of Jesus in these languages changes from a Hebrew name to a Greek or Latin name. They then try to pronounce them using Greek and Latin rules of pronunciation of letter symbols. If they were smart people, they would say, hey, this letter has the exact same phonetic pronunciation as the letter symbol in Paleo-Hebrew. Until the name of Jesus in Paleo-Hebrew was correctly transliterated. Wow, what a simple procedure of taking the name of Jesus from one language into another.
But the grunt club, no. They will not do it because they love making a lie.
This UPC guy claims Jesus is a fake and false name and it should be Joshua, Jehoshua, Yahweh-shua, Jeshua, and means Jehovah has come in the flesh, and this Jehovah is YHWH/YHVH. He went right to James Strong's personal opinions and lies. He does not understand that before 1200AD there was no Chaldee lexicon or dictionary giving spellings and meanings of Jewish/Hebrew names. I mean, come on people: the rabbis did not put the vowel marks on the Aramaic letters until between 800-1200AD. No one knew what the letters mean. Even the Jews could not decide. So how can there be any lexicon and dictionary? What developed after the vowel marks were introduced was a guessing game. It remains a guessing game. In many thosands of cases they do not know if the correct vowel was marked. Take the letters BR, you can make this "beer" or "bear" and by adding the vowels you come up with two completely different words meaning two totally different things. Who can check the Masoretic rabbis to make sure they did it right? No one. This is why the Greek New Testament is so powerful. If the Greek gives us a word, a quote of Scripture, it gives us our authority. If the Apostles used certain words to be what was in the Old Testament, we trust it and do not doubt it. And in this New Testament they did not use the tetragrammaton, Jehovah, Yahweh, or these other invented names of Jesus that have no proven Paleo-Hebrew origin. The grunt club trashes the name of Jesus.
So I ask this UPC guy to please tell me what name he uses:
In worship of Jesus;
In songs:
In water baptism:
In casting out demons;
In praying for the sick.
He trashed Jesus name and said it was fake and false and wanted the Paleo-Hebrew name, and then said he and his UPC church still use the name of Jesus. Go figure....
Then he said, well, it is not a salvational issue.
He said there was a name higher than the name of Jesus. When I asked him what that name was. What his UPC church taught that name was, he refused to answer.
The grunt club:
Jehovah/Yahweh yes
Jesus no.
But this specially created man, made by God for his glory, stands by the name of Jesus. Jesus is a Hebrew name. If you do not believe that, you are a lying hypocrite if you continue to use it while at the same time you trash it.
Jesus is the name above all names.
Bishop Reckart
A Man God Made (actually specially made)
_________________________________________
By The Way (BTW)
If you sign up for email notifications you can be notified when any new articles are posted here on the Jewish Jesus Blog.
I believe the reason why many believe that the Tetragrammaton is above the name Jesus is because of Acts 2:16-21 using CEB which reads:
ReplyDelete[16] Rather, this is what was spoken through the prophet Joel:
[17] In the last days, God says,I will pour out my Spirit on all people.Your sons and daughters will prophesy.Your young will see visions.Your elders will dream dreams.
[18] Even upon my servants, men and women,I will pour out my Spirit in those days,and they will prophesy.
[19] I will cause wonders to occur in the heavens above and signs on the earth below,blood and fire and a cloud of smoke.
[20] The sun will be changed into darkness,
and the moon will be changed into blood,
before the great and spectacular day of the Lord comes.
[21] And everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.[a]
We will notice in Verse 16 that it appear that Peter is quoting from Joel 2:28-32 which is from the OT and it is believe by many that the Tetragrammaton should be in the verse on Acts 2:21 since it is being seemed to be quoted Joel 2:28-32.
I believe that is why people are believing that the Tetragrammaton name was above the name Jesus and that Peter first message was calling upon the Tetragrammaton name for salvation.
Blessing to you and family in Jesus name!
Yes, we know this.
ReplyDeleteThe problem is, which many refuse to adjust to and correct, is that Peter WAS NOT QUOTING from the Aramaic Masorretic text which is the basis of the King James translation. The Masoretic text in the KJV did not exist in the days of Jesus and the Apostles. It was invented and created by rabbi Ben Ezra and his family between 800-1200AD. So Peter could not have quoted from that Old Testament, it did not exist.
Now what Bible did Peter quote from?
He quoted from the Greek Septuagint and it did not have the tetragrammaton in Joel 2:28-32. So, any attempt to claim Peter was quoting from a Bible text that had YHWH in it and they can now change Peter's quote to add it, is false.
We do not have the Aramaic Bible text of this passage that existed in the days of Jesus and the Apostle Peter. It does not exist. They want us to accept by blind faith that the Jews would not pervert the Word of God and we can trust the Masoretic text to be an accurate copy of the ancient record. I do not trust them at all. The rabbis are all liars. Let me illustrate what I mean.
The Greek Septuagint was translated from Paleo-Hebrew around 280BC. The Jews loved it and they used it in all their synagogues. They loved it until 90AD. Now that is 370 years. Then in 90AD, because the Christians were using their sacred Greek Scriptures to prove Jesus was the Messieh and King of Israel, they decided they hated it now and wanted a new Greek translation. So rabbi Akiba and the Pharisees hired the apostate Aquila to make them a new Greek translation. In this new perverted translation, Akiba had Aquila to put the tetragrammaton. From this several more Greek translations birthed with the tetragrmmaton in it. But they were all rabbi frauds. If they would not accept and keep pure the Greek that was translated in 280BC and wanted it changed: how are they going to prove to me they would not have changed the Aramaic text? It is an absolute lie that the Dead Sea Scrolls are identical to the Masoretic text. There are hundreds of differences.
Peter did not quote from any Bible that had the tetragrammaton in it. So, any attempt to take Lord in his quote and convert it to this tetragrammaton is fraud.
Thank you for your rely sir. that explains a lot. I also almost got into a tetragrammaton cult after seeing that they will attack anyone who use the name Jesus and that they have so much hated toward their enemies which is not living by the word since Jesus said that we are to love our neighbors and our enemies,
ReplyDeleteOne last question sir; where is this idea that the name Jesus came from the so called Greek god named Zeus? When i say the name Jesus, it does sound as if it does have a Z sound in it, could you explain why? Thank you and more blessings in Jesus name!
Z sound is not a J sound. The S sound does have a Z sound but it would be like saying JeZus and not Je-zoos. Which is a perversion they are good at. But the fact is, the Greek name Jesus as IESOUS, does not have two Z sounds like IEZOUZ. So it is a complete fabrication by liars trying to make name associations by simularity of sounds. Zeus itself is a misspelling. The Greeks did not call Zeus Jesus. So that lie is settled. And they did not call Zeus by the phoneitc Zeus either. The name Zeus as they spoke it was spelled this way: dis-ooce (See Strongs #2203).
ReplyDeleteThe liars are trying to blot out the name of Jesus from the earth and a lot of people helping them by saying Jesus is not the name of Jesus.
Check this out: http://www.yahwehism.com/html/sacred-name.html
Click ok or you get to watch rabbits jump. :)