A comparison may be made by looking at the alphabet symbols. But what cannot be accepted is that Aramaic alphabet sounds were identical to ancient Paleo-Hebrew alphabet symbols. There has been a backward application of Aramaic alphabet symbol sounds upon ancient Paleo-Hebrew and this is linguistic fraud. This fraud is then expanded to explain how the tetragrammaton is both pronounced as to alphabet symbols and then the pronounciation of YHWH as Jehovah or Yahweh.
There is absolutley no truth to the claims by the tetragrammaton cults, that the ancient name of God was Jehovah or Yahweh, or Yahuah for that matter.
We already know the names Jehovah and Yahweh are invented names by catholic monks.
We also now know that modern scholars are calling the Masoretic scribes liars for vowel marking YHVH to be pronounced as Jehovah. Scholars now say Jehovah is a bastard name. It is not a true name. Then on the other hand claim that the Masoretic text had the hand of God upon the scribes who invented it so that it is without error. This is a contradiction. If God inspired the Masoretic scribes to vowel mark YHVH as Jehovah, how is it then a bastard name?
They bastardize the name Jehovah because they want to replace it with YHWH and then with Yahweh. Yahweh can be accounted for in the Assyrian Babylon pantheon by the clay tablets that records this ancient god. But the name Jehovah cannot be authenticated by any old clay tablets. We can see then that Yahweh has Assyrian Babylonian roots where as Jehovah as a name has catholic roots that date to about 1280AD.
One of the very apparent manipulation of alphabet symbol sounds has to do with the fifth letter in the chart. Many scholars will admit this symbol has the I, Y, and J sounds. Many scholars will not admit to the Y or the J sound and decipher the symbol as the Iod. But since Iod will not allow Yod or even Jod, this was fixed by modern scholars since the 1700s adding Y to the I and now we see the fifth letter being rendered as an I or Y sound and never the J sound. Only those scholars who are honest will admit the J sound. This is important because it shows that although there was no J letter symbol back then, there was a J letter sound back then going by a different alphabet symbol. After all, all of our English alphabet letter symbols do not exist back there. So will make a clamor against the J letter symbol. Why not admit that we are looking for identical alphabet sounds not identical alphabet symbols.
Aramaic is not Hebrew. Anyone who claims it is, is lying.