Thursday, January 5, 2012

Who is it?

I have been challenged over the past years about Jesus being the Messieh (Christ). There are some pretty hateful people out there. They can claim Jesus was not the Messieh but they are false. They can claim like John Hagee (Christians United For Israel) that Jesus no where claimed to be Christ or the Messieh. But they are all false.

Here are a few things to think about:

In Matthew 23:7, 10 we have these words of Jesus:

7 But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.
10 Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.

Who is the Rabbi who is also Christ if Jesus is not referring to himself?
Who is the Master who is also Christ if Jesus is not referring to himself?
Who is this Christ if it is not Jesus?

This is just one of many come-backs I use on these lying naysayers who claim Jesus Christ or Jesus Messieh has not come in the flesh.

Of course, I go to the Epistle of John to prove that anyone who claims Jesus is not the Christ (Messieh) is antichrist. I get so tired of all these liars emailing me and calling me a devil and a false prophet because I stand up for Jesus being the Christ. I have no patience with these kinds of people. They are already reprobate being antichrist. I have no desire to convert them or even try. I believe they are unable to be brought to repentance.

When we believe in Jesus as the Messieh, we are believing in the Jesus who is both Lord and Christ. And when we say Lord we mean God. When we say Christ we mean the son of David and heir to the throne of Israel. We mean nothing more or less.

When we say Lord Jesus Christ we know what we mean. Anyone who does not speak according to this testimony they are deceivers and liars. I warn all of you, do not follow them. Flee from them as quick as you can.

Jesus is Christ because I said so. And my authority for saying this is found in the Apostle's Doctrine.

Bishop Reckart
Servant that God loves

6 comments:

  1. He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son. And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life. These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God. And this is the confidence that we have in him, that, if we ask any thing according to his will, he heareth us (1John 5:10-14):

    To walk away from Jesus is to walk away from life. To have Jesus is to have life; hence you are a son of God or born of God. To have Jesus is to be begotten by the word according Acts 2:38 with Acts 2:4 experience. It marvels me when I hear people claim that Jews in Palestine are the people of God by virtue of being a racial Jews. These ignore the fact that most of them do not believe in Jesus as the Messieh and King of Israel, neither are they saved according to our apostolic heritage documented in Acts 2:38. John here is very clear, he that have son hath life and that you cannot get life no other way. In fact, he said God hath given life to us by means of his son Jesus ONLY. As a result those Jews claiming to have life without Jesus by claiming the father only, but rejecting the son will come in for shocker. Those supporting this view will receive a rude awakening.

    Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: (but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also. Let that therefore abide in you, which ye have heard from the beginning. If that which ye have heard from the beginning shall remain in you, ye also shall continue in the Son, and in the Father. And this is the promise that he hath promised us, even eternal life. These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you (1John 2:22-26).

    Firstly, John refers to these as antichrist. See if you deny the Son, you will be guilty of denying the Father as well. The Jews have no getting away here; it is Jesus or nothing. You must confess the Father is manifested in the Son only. Isn’t it any wonder that John said, “He that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.” Don’t let anyone rob you of your inheritance in Jesus Messieh, which is life eternal. To lay hold on life we have to affirm our faith in both the Father and the Son. We will have no relationship with God at all if we refuse to submit to Jesus. Yes, apostolic know that all of the Father was manifested in the Jesus alone (Colossians 2:9). When we sing the song “It’s All In Him” we mean ALL of the Father (fullness of God) is in Jesus the Son of God. As a result we believe in Father in Son Only and not Jesus only as per Trinitarian and Twinitarian claims.

    The label “Jesus Only” is a Catholic invented term used to mock apostolic as antichrist using the above scripture. Here they claim that oneness do not acknowledge the Father because we refused to confess Father and Son as separate and distinct persons of their trinity Godhead. The Trinitarians know that we oneness believe that God the Father is a Spirit and that He is Holy; hence the Holy Spirit is the same as God the Father, one and the same. They also know that we believe that ALL of God the Father was incarnated/manifested as the Son of the Living God, which was at first referred to as Messieh in Hebrew, but later by the Greek Christ. They know that in our doctrine of Jesus is the Messieh we are confessing the humanity (sonship) and deity (God nature) of Jesus intertwined in a hypostasis unity just like how Jesus and his apostles taught it. Jesus said, if we refused to believe that He is the Father in flesh we will die in our sins (John 8:24-27).

    Jesus Son

    ReplyDelete
  2. Here is another excerpt from another study I have written, which will add to this.

    The Apostle John puts it this way:

    • From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him. Then said Jesus unto the twelve, Will ye also go away? Then Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go? Thou hast the words of eternal life. And we believe and are sure that thou art the Christ, the son of the living God (John 6:66-68).

    Jesus asked, and now Brother Oscene is asking, “Will you also go away from Jesus.” Also, will your answer be like Peter’s? Peter refused to walk away from Jesus, he refused to turn back, he refused to quit; therefore, he refused to go back to the life that he use to live. Peter choose Jesus, because he know who Jesus was, the Messieh, God in flesh.

    Clearly, those who turn back were no longer confident that Jesus was the Messieh, the son of the living God, and God in Flesh. In other words, they were saying we are looking for eternal life, but because Jesus failed our messianic test, they said we will not follow Him any more since what we are looking for he CANNOT give it to us. You do not have what we want sir, they claim, so we are out. And John said they went back! But back to where? Clearly to go search for life outside of Jesus; hence they went looking for another Messieh that will pass their messianic test. What a sad day for these fools, looking for life outside of life (Jesus – John 1:3)? So when Jesus asked the question of the remaining twelve, “Will ye also go away?” it was within the context of some not believing in Him as the Messieh, the son of the living God, and thereby being able to give life as was recorded in many prophecy of the Messieh in many Old Covenant scriptures. In other words Jesus was asking His 12 disciples, do you believe I am the Messieh and thereby able to give you eternal life?

    Peter, the spokes man articulated the agreed position of the group after they had met and deliberated it. This was not a quick response. They would have evaluated Jesus’ claim to be the Messieh (John 4:25-26) and compare it with the scriptures. I can see them going through the scriptures looking at many texts like Isaiah 7:14 – virgin birth, Micah 5:2 – Bethlehem birth placed, Palms 132:11 – son of David, Isaiah 35:4-7 – healing ministry and the many more scriptures he fulfilled up to that point. Coming out of that discussion, they were ALL totally convinced that Jesus was indeed the Messieh and King of Israel; hence was the possessor of life eternally. Peter was chosen as the spokesperson for the group. He said, “To whom shall WE (not Peter alone, but Peter and the 11) go. Thou hast the words of eternal life.” In other words we do not know of any other who can and will give us what we are looking for, that is, eternal life. Also, “WE (all the 12) believe and ARE (plural) sure thou are the Messieh.” You have satisfied all that are written in the scriptures about you up to this point, which are enough to give us complete assurance that you are in fact God manifested in the flesh; hence, we have nowhere else to go or no one else to go to. All we need is in you, so we CANNOT and WILL NEVER walk away from you.

    Jesus Son

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jesus Son, you are a true son. I am very proud of your faith and your ability to write the simple truth. Many have not those great and good qualities. They are distracted by their own false doctrines and inventions. There are not many Men of God today who have the true revelation of Jesus Messieh. They are all backbiters and sniviling wolves. But our here in the world there are a few Men of God who separate themselves unto the true knowledge and revelation of Jesus. These cannot and will not remain in Laodicae or some other crazy group who deny Jesus was the Father incarnate. They must have their two or three gods. Thanks Jesus son for a well written article.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Trinity? Can someone show me any apostle or that any of the 120 in the upper room believed in the trinity? So where is there any such thing as a trinitarian Pentecostal? Help please!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Trinitarian Pentecostals (TPs)

    I know Bishop Reckart will give you an eloquent response, but let me add my bit.

    The term "TP" is not in the bible anywhere, but more importantly, the doctrine conveyed in the terminology is also not found in the scripture anywhere. However, within the body of Christian literature it's a fairly frequently used terminology.

    Clearly, the terminology was coined from two words, Trinity and Pentecost. Trinity is a developed doctrine in 2nd century, which was made law at Nicaea 325AD and improved upon Constantinople 381AD. A full theological argument for Trinitarianism took over centuries to be developed. However, Pentecost is found with the Scriptures; and it means 50th starting on the first Sabbath after the Feast of Passover. It is ALWAYS a first day of the week. It is on this day the Holy Ghost (HG) came (New Law) and the church was born. Pentecost marks the beginning of the Church, which is when the kingdom comes, and the queen’s day.

    It must be noted that Pentecostal means those who believe in Pentecost, but we need to make plain that the word "Pentecostal" on the lips and in the mouth of TPs, DOES NOT mean that they believe everything written about and was practice on Pentecost. We know this is TRUE because ALL of them refuse to baptize their candidates in Jesus' name. They reject the post-trib, Jesus is the One God, soul-sleep, and salvation in Jesus alone doctrines in Acts 2. As a result when these use the word PENTECOST it is ONLY focused on the infilling of the Holy Ghost evidence by speaking in tongues and nothing more. In this regard they have perverted the meaning of the word Pentecost to mean infilling of the Holy Ghost with tongues. To this perversion they add another perversion - Trinitarian.

    What do they mean by these two words TPs? They mean that they believe in 3 gods (GF, GS, GHG) and also they believe in infilling of the HG with tongues. The term DOES NOT in any way implies that these are saved or a part of the church. And it most definitely DO NOT mean they are disciples of Jesus or Apostolic. TPs fail to realize that Pentecost is the 50th day starting the first Sabbath after Passover and that on this day HG came, the kingdom come, the first apostolic message was preach, converts were baptized in Jesus' name, Jesus was taught to be the one God and not a second person in the Trinity, soul-sleep, post-trib coming and rapture, holiness unto the Lord, etc. So it is near insanity if anyone could believe that he can REJECT 95% of the doctrine taught by the Apostles on Pentecost and after into which those converted on Pentecost continued stedfastly (Acts 2:42) and still be considered a Pentecostal.

    What’s the problem? The problem lies in the definition of the phrase. Many false doctrine and terminology came about by using a false definition. For example, predestination, divorce and remarriage, etc. What we therefore need to do is to define these terms as per scripture so as to be able to better evaluate them. In the case of TPs: Trinitarians – those who hold the Trinity doctrine as truth and Pentecostals – holds that HG came with tongues, by these two definition the term TP just identifies two pieces of the faith of those who are so called; hence not a contradiction in on of itself. Note; we know Trinitarianism is a false doctrine. But if we define Pentecostals as those who hold true and practice every doctrine the apostles taught on Pentecost and afterwards, the terminology TPs would now be relegated to a contradiction or an oxymoron. This would be so because the Apostle taught that Jesus is both Lord and Messieh (God and man), which opposes the Trinitarian view of Jesus. In a similar way a Christian CANNOT be a Trinitarian, twinitarian, Unitarian, etc. because they are following Jesus who taught clearly that is was the very God of Glory who manifested in the flesh and we beheld it (WORD MADE FLESH) as the ONLY BEGOTTEN of FATHER (John 1:1,14).

    Jesus Messieh peace be with you

    Jesus

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you Jesus son:

    Trinity=Catholic
    Pentecostal=one who is like those on the day of Pentecost (Acts 1 & 2), who received the baptism of the Holy Ghost with the evidence of speaking in other tongues.

    There was no Catholic in the upper room.
    There was no trinitarian in the upper room nor in any of the 27 books of the New Testament Church.

    Saying trinity pentecostal is the same thing as saying Catholic daughter of Rome.

    All trinitarians are Catholic even if they do not believe everything their mother church believes.

    No trinitarian will be saved unless they return to the faith of the 120 who were Oneness. No one will ever prove the 120 believed in the trinity of Gods doctrine.

    Jesus son is absolutely correct in all that he has said.

    My warning to all Oneness who are now bringing in these trinity pentecostals to teach and preach: you have apostated. Oneness cannot have fellowship with Catholic pentecostals who deny the rest of Acts 2 and refuse to be baptized in Jesus Christ name.

    So you are right poster: there is no such thing as a trinity pentecostal. This is a man-made name and it is false.

    ReplyDelete