When the name of Jesus is replaced in the Laodicaea churches with invented names created by men, he cannot be there in the midst of them. He said it clearly, "where two or three of you are gathered in MY NAME, I will be in the midst of you...

." If Jesus is not in the midst of Laodicaea, then they are not gathered in his name alone. We are rushing into a time Jesus name is being replaced by the names of Jehovah, Yahweh, Yahuah, Yah, Jah, Yahshua, and others. Jesus will not be in the midst of these churches. You will witness more and more, Jesus name less mentioned and these other names praised. I refuse to be inside a Laodicaea church. When any church worships or praises, or sings to any other name, I am leaving. Yes, I am going to answer the knock. I will open the door and flee. I got it. I am on.

New Discoveries Prove Ancient J Letter Sound Symbols

Many lies are being spread by the YHWH cults that the modern letter J and its sound had no ancient counterpart. We now know this is all lies. The letter J in that shape and figure did not exist, nor did any of our other letters. But most of these have ancient counterpart symbols representating the same sounds. We now know the ancient symbols that contained the J sound. Greek Iesous is Jesous. Latin Iesvs is Jesvs. Hebrew Iehsha(s) is Jehsha(s). Our English/Hebrew name Jesus is as close as we need to get to the original languages.

Did God preserve his name as Jesus in the King James Version and other ancient Bibles? I say he did. My research proves there were ancient symbols that contained the J letter sound.

Exalt and lift up the name of Jesus above all names.

Letter J Sound Is Very Ancient

The YHWH Golem cults say the letter J did not exist in the days of Jesus, therefore, there could be no name Jesus. The fact is, should we compare just about all the modern English/Latin/Greek letters with ancient letter forms, none of them look like the ancient forms. Yet the ancient forms had nearly the same letter sounds attributed to modern English/Latin/Greek letters. The J letter likewise did not exist in that form in ancient times, but there were letter forms that had the J letter sound. This chart proves this. How some letter forms shifted away from the J sound to sounds like I or even Y or H, can only be due to dialect changes of words or names being transliterated. Language is a learned habit which is mostly transferred by written communications such as Bibles, books, and other government or public uses and applications. The name of Jesus is a valid Hebrew name. It was on the Cross in Latin, Greek, and Paleo-Hebrew. There is no other name given for salvation (Acts 4:12).

Tracing Jehovah As An Evil Name

When people do not agree that YHWH is not the name of God, and therefore not the name of Jesus, they are manifest as tares. Jesus did not come in the name YHWH and this proves by itself YHWH is not the name of God. Jesus came in the Father's name and it was Jesus, otherwise Jesus would have another name. If Jehovah, Yahweh, Yahshua, Joshua, Jehoshua, (any of these) are the name of Jesus, they we can say they are the name of God. We now can see who the wheat is and who the tares are.

Everything that is not Kingdom Of God is kingdom of darkness. Everyone not in the Kingdom of God is in the kingdom of the devil. Everyone in the Kingdom of God is the wheat. Everyone in the kingdom of the devil are the tares. The tares will do their best to cause the wheat to be hurt and harmed. But harvest time is coming.

Do not deny the name of Jesus.
It is the true name of God in the New Testament times.

Pastor Reckart
A Man God Made

Defending The Name Of Jesus

Singing praises to Jesus name began for me when I was four years old. A barefoot toddler in the hills of West Virginia, born into a poor family. My mother was converted out of the Brethren church, the Baptist church, and the Methodist church. It was in 1949 she discovered salvation was not in joining a church and shaking a preacher's hand. She was just 32 years old. Her exodus from the Catholic/Protestant denominations occurred on a Sunday evening when she received the gift of the Holy Ghost with the evidence of speaking in tongues.

I was four years old when salvation came into our house. This Acts 2:38 salvation never departed after it entered. My mother never backslid. She remained faithful to the Lord Jesus for the next 24 years, dying at the age of 56. When she passed, Pastor Reckart was just 28 years old. The four year old was now her Pastor. She birth, trained, taught, and raised up the shy little boy who would be the one to finalize her journey to meet Jesus.

It was in those formative years Pastor Reckart learned a lot about the name of Jesus. But generally it was about Acts 2:38 and the name of baptism and initial salvation. We sang songs to Jesus name. We worshipped Jesus name. We praised Jesus name. We called on Jesus name for help, for miracles, to cast out demons, doing all things in that name. But the real indepth knowledge of that name was never taught. We believed in this name because it was in the King James Version and this was the Bible Jesus and the Apostles used. So, if it was in the KJV no more was needed to understand, we just accepted the name of Jesus how ever it was used in the Bible.

At the same time I was born, during my childhood years, and during my junior adult years, there was birthing in the United States an apostate religious movement that was denying the name of Jesus and was teaching this name meant pig god. This group was teaching if a person was not rebaptized in the name of YHWH, which was said to be pronounced Yahweh, they could not be saved. The YHWH movement spread rapidly in the underground out of sight of most Jesus Name churches. Only here and there one would rise but they were ignored. Any souls lost to these apostates were considered people who never would be under subjection anyway and so the trend was just to say good-riddance. But this little group of YHWH people would not cease to exist. They would grow in massive numbers as more and more people were convinced the name of Jesus came from the Greek god Zeus, or from some other alleged source. In all of Pastor Reckart's years of ministry he never met one of these people. He had only heard of them.

It was in 1993 Pastor Reckart was challenged to meet these YHWH people and defend the name of Jesus. The debate was in Conyer's Georgia. This was a debate that would change the future of the world and in many nations in regards to the name of Jesus. Pastor Reckart assembled the greatest collection of information in defense of the name of Jesus ever assembled any where in the world. Since that time, he has shared his findings with many thousands of people and ministers. The sharing continues but not without a massive storm of hate from many people who refuse to give up the YHWH pagan name the Jews inserted into the Bible scrolls beginning in Babylon with the Aramaic text.

In defending the name of Jesus, other doctrines were soon affected. Ways we did and said things, the doctrines we taught that were all associated with YHWH were soon challenged. And from these battles and wars of the YHWH people against the name of Jesus, Pastor Reckart remains steadfast and dedicated to educate the world.

There are many haters, many gossipers, many slanders, many novice idiots, and even some pretty impressive men of God, who refuse to lift up the name of Jesus above all names.

Today in many nations, Jesus is raising up his sheep. They will lift up his name above all names.

I can honestly say, there is no other name equal to or that exceeds the name of Jesus.

YHWH is a false name and any names such as Jehovah or Yahweh are false. We should not be using them in any of our Apostolic Churches. These names were invented by Catholic monks. Is it a hard thing to admit these are fake and false names we have been taught to praise and worship?

Come now beloved of the Lord, come apart from the nations and the world, come and lift up the name of Jesus above all names. I send forth this plea "come"according to Revelation 21:17. COME!

Syriac Language Proves The J Sound Did Exist

We have heard the lies and the hate against the name of Jesus for many years. I first encountered this hate back in 1993 when I was challenged by two Yahweh prophets to defend the name of Jesus. I had never in my life heard the name of Jesus call the pig god name. These two prophets were the first I ever heard to outright and in public blaspheme the name of Jesus.

In the four debates I had with these people, They repeatedly said Jesus was a fake name that was derived from Zeus.  They said the sus ending the name Jesus meant pig in Latin, therefore, in Latin Jesus was a pig god. I never heard such hate against the name of Jesus.

I stood alone in Conyers, Georgia before nearly 300 people. Many preachers present. None of them stood with me that day. They are like those of Meroz (Judges 5:23). I wanted help so bad, but no one came to help me. I stood alone and defended the name of Jesus.

My opponents had a long table full of books written by rabbis, monks, priests, and scholars. They had several bible versions. They had notes of several men. In their speeches against the name of Jesus they repeatedly said there was no letter J in ancient Hebrew, in Aramaic, in Greek, in Latin, and so forth. They said this proves Jesus could have never existed. They challenged me why Jesus would have a Greek name and not a Hebrew name. They paraded up book after book testifying there was no J letter value in the ancient languages to say the name Jesus. They presented book after book. Even pulled out Dr. James Strange (Strong's) book on the Hebrew and Greek. I shut that down pretty quick by asking of Dr. Strange wa correct that YHWH was Jehovah? They both replied Dr. Strange was false on this, and YHWH was really Yahweh not Jehovah. With this one error of Dr. Strange, I had them put away his book and not parade it out any more because he had lied on YHWH being Jehovah.

The debate was friendly. My opponents were not going to be converted back to the name of Jesus. They had blasphemed this worthy name so viciously they would not repent. But, I proved over and over the name of Jesus was valid. One professor from a Church of Christ Bible College/University came up to me after my first two half hour sessions, and told me he learned more about the name of Jesus in my one hour of speeches than he had heard or known in his over 30 years as a Bible teacher. He told me I was right. Yet there in my midst were over 30 preachers and ministers and none of them came to me and told me I had done a good job defending the name of Jesus. Not ONE!

Those Yahweh prophets spent considerable time on the letters YHWH and as you know they said those letters as Yud-Hay-Vaw-Hay. They challenged me to produce one proof that Y was or could be pronounced with the J sound. I proved using the Syrian alphabet that the Jud did exist and it was corrupted into the Yud. In the above chart, you can see it yourself. The ancient Syriac language had the Jud which was the original pronunciation of the letter I before it was corrupted to be come a Y sound somewhere back there. I personally believe the Y sound given to the letter I and Jud and changed to Yud came about in the diaspora after 70AD and among the Germanic people and the Yiddish mixture.

In any case, I want to lay before you, the reader, the proof that the J letter sound did exist in ancient times. It was used in the letter I and in saying Israel we can say the I as a J sound as Jsrael jez-ra-el. And if the people who are called by name will repent? Wonder now what God was getting at? Anyone have an idea?

Bishop Reckart
A Jesus Name Only Man

Ancient Latin Did Have J Sound Letter

Among the Italians they say Jesus as Gesu. Most of our modern so-called scholars have purposely perverted information. Most of them copy, cut, paste the lies of many hundreds before them. No lies here on the Jewish Jesus Blog.

Ok, let's work this backward. The Italians call Jesus Gesu. Some say it differently. Some say it as jay-zoo and some say it as jez-oooo. Either way or even another way, they are trying to say Jesus. Most online speaking programs will pronounce Gesu as jay-zooo.

We now turn our attention on a more weighty direction. That is, Italian derives from Latin. Latin is the mother tongue. What we have in the name Gesu is a pronunciation in letter form. Behind this Gesu is the Latin name for Jesus IESVS. Gesu appears to be the pronunciation of IESV with the final (S) omitted. Gesu is then seen easily as IESV. The V is pronounced as a U with the long ooooo sound. So we have in Latin IES-Uooooo. The Italian language has preserved for us the pronunciation of IES as GES. We know from the pronunciation of GES it is the same as JES. We also know that JES is anciently in Latin IES.

We can now make the point all this brings to bear. That is, Italian gives us the way to pronounce IESVS as it was upon the Cross in Latin. We now know from the daughter tongue of Latin, Italian, that if Gesu is a correct genealogical derivative, that the G now is a letter form sound of J as in Jay-zoo. This without any question is the way the letter I was pronounced in the name IESVS on the Cross. So IESVS is really JESVS and at last JESUS. The Italian language has preserved for us the Latin spelling of the pronunciation of the name of Jesus on the Cross.

When someone lies to you that the letter J did not exist so therefore the name of Jesus could not be accurate, you can tell them, yest, the letter J in ancient Latin existed as the letter I. The actual letter J with the tail curve on the bottom of the letter I proves the fact the J sound came from the letter I. And if it came from the letter I, how and by what language was I pronounced with the Jay sound?

We have it before our face in the Italian language in the name of Jesus as Gesu (jay-soo). Why Italian did not retain the final (S) is immaterial. We can add it back and not destroy anything about GESU. In fact we could go back to IESVS and know the name of Jesus was Jesus.

Now, go out into the world and plow up those fields of thorns and nettles and plant some wheat. And if anyone rejected you, hates you, or slanders you because of lifting up the name of Jesus above all names: that person will come under the judgments of God.

Bishop Reckart
A son of the Blood Name JESUS

Know Ye The Holy Ghost

There is a difference in reference to the Spirit of God before Jesus and after the resurrection.

Before the resurrection it is properly Holy Spirit. This Holy Spirit within Jesus was OT. Jesus live all his life under the law.

But the Holy Spirit in Jesus cannot be received until he is glorified. After his resurrection this Holy Spirit is called the Holy Ghost, referring to having dwelt in a human body.

While it is the same Spirit, it is a different dimension.

One Holy Spirit before the resurrection and then after the resurrection referred to Jesus as his Holy Ghost. So we accept only that Holy Spirit that flows through the body of Jesus.

No one can any more receive the Spirit of God except through Jesus.

So no Jew, no Muslim, no anyone, can claim the have the Spirit of God and deny Jesus.

No one can have the Holy Spirit unless now they receive the Spirit that was in Christ.

This Holy Spirit is called the Holy Ghost. We know the Spirit in Christ. We know it is the everlasting Father. We know the Spirit that was in Christ was in the OT time in many people. But we want to make sure we do not tell people they can have this Spirit and be Christ deniers, or they can have it and deny Calvary.

This is a revelation. It is not new. The Spirit that was in Christ is the one we want in us.

There are many spirits in people confessing not that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh.

If we are confused on this doctrine and revelation we will be telling people who are demon possessed that they have the Spirit of God.

Every spirit that speaks in tongues is not the true Spirit of Christ. No man speaking by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus Christ accursed. And no man can say Jesus is Lord except by the Holy Ghost, that Spirit that was in Christ. This Spirit will testify of Christ because he cannot deny himself.

Many people worship Jews and claim they have the Spirit of God and these Jews hate and deny Jesus and curse him as a mamzer, a devil, and a false prophet.

We know they do not have the same Holy Ghost of Jesus. Wherefore we shall know who has the real Holy Ghost. We will also look for the fruits of this Holy Ghost Spirit.

Know Ye The Holy Ghost
Bishop Reckart
Doing what Bishops are supposed to do....

I Stand With God's True Israel

Thanks Missionary Hood for this great image.

The Aramaic Babel Tongue Is Not Hebrew

So many are falling prey to the Jewish deception that the Babel tongue of Babylon they adopted when taken there as captives has become a special holy tongue above all others in the world.

I realize it has been nearly 2,618 years since the Jews were taken captive from Jerusalem to Babylon. Yes, it has been 26 centuries and 104 generations. We do not know why the captives chose to replace their more ancient language of Paleo Hebrew with this new Babel tongue. But they did.

I personally believe they adopted it because in Babylon there existed a highly secret mysticism of satanism which was called secret knowledge. This was later identified as gnosticism. Within this secrety mystery religion the alphabet was turned into a special means of secret communication. Letters took on numerical value and numerology was born. Together these letters and numerology codes were used to hide special mystic meanings. The entire religious system had masters. These masters were called rabbis. A Babylonian rabbi was a master within the secret religious system. They were educated in all the knowledge of the Babel cults.

Why many Jews adopted this mystery system and the Babel tongue we do not know. We do know that in the time of Daniel there were only three others with him who refused to bow and to partake of the Babel system. There may have been others but we cannot tell. We do know that every single aspect of the mysteries of Babylon were transferred over into the Jewish religion. The Jewish religion was totally mysticised with all these new discoveries. It is here that Jewish mysticism was born and later brought to Israel by the Pharisees. They are the ones who brought back the title "rabbi" or master. You will no find this title in the Old Testament any where. It came from Babylon.

This gets us to why the Aramaic language holds such high value to the mystic Jews and has impregnated all Jewish religious beliefs with black witchcraft influence. From this the Kabbalah was born. From this several different philosophies came into the religious system born at Babel. There are several books like the Zoar, the Mishnah, the Babylonian Talmud, and other secret writings that contain the total of the mysticism of Babel. It is vital to this Babel system to use the Aramaic language and alphabet. And it is vital for those Jews who follow this pagan religious system to tell the world how accurately they transcribed each letter of this Babel language. How careful they were to make sure this Chaldee tongue was copied by strict rules of conduct. They do this to swoon the minds of those Gentiles who question if this Babel tongue language and the scrolls written in them are from God. They make sure they use numerology at its best to convince Gentiles this new Aramaic Babel bible is holy and infallible, the unadulterated Word of God. And many millions buy this falsehood.

I want all of you to to be on full alert not to accept any doctrine that comes from this Aramaic Babel tongue. Do not try to learn this tongue. Do not sing in it. Do not learn scriptures taken from it. I also caution you not to accept any names for Jesus invented from this Babel tongue. I say this because the Apostles did not use Yeshua or such invented Aramaic names. We have no idea when this Aramaic name was invented. The Apostles did not use it and I shall not. Aramaic is not Hebrew it is a pagan Babel language.

When you check words in Strongs pay attention to the Chald entry showing this word and meaning came from Babylon. Be careful how you apply this information. We do not know the Paleo Hebrew words or meanings. We can only guess from the internal content of the Scriptures. Also, when someone comes saying Jesus is a fake name and they offer a Babel Aramaic one, do not accept it.

And do not accept YHWH which came into the Jewish scrolls in Babylon and is surrounded with mysticism, numerology, and gematria. Pay attemtion that this YHWH god is a bisexual god. We know the religious rituals of Babylon were sexual and bisexual in nature. We know also, the true God of Abraham was not YHWH and he was not a bisexual god. Any name guessed from YHWH is a devil name. This includes Jehovah and Yahweh.

I say in closing that many of the devil name people say Greek is an evil language and Jesus name in it as IESOUS is of the devil. They attack Jesus name as the name of a pagan god. These do not know that Greek is closer related to Paleo Hebrew than Aramaic. In fact, Greek and Paleo Hebrew share the same root language of Phoenician. So, do not let these Babel tongue people deceive you that Jesus name is false because it is not a Chaldee name from the Babel tongue.

Jesus name is as close in English and we can get it. Do not let law keeping wannabe Babel Israelites deceive you to recant the name of Jesus. If you do this you will go straight to hell. You need to read Hebrews 6:4-6. If you deny the name of Jesus fire awaits you.

151

Greatest Jewish Conversion

We do not know the names of his mother or father. All we know is that they were part of the diaspora that existed before the birth of Jesus. He was born in Gentile lands in Tarsus a city of Cilicia. His parents had to be people of financial means because they sent him to Jerusalem for special Torah training in the school of Gamaliel. Gamaliel was the greatest Bible teacher of the Jewish religion, knowing perhaps more than any man then living. To be trained under such a teacher was an honor. In reflecting on his education in this school he told the mob in Acts 22 that he learned the most perfect manner of law interpretation that had been known by the fathers.  He confessed he had developed a zeal for God and for those things he had learned, so great he felt a personal responsibility to destroy Christianity. To destroy this new Jewish Judaism he went to the grass-roots core of poor people and persecuted them. He was friends with the High Priest who gave him letters of authorization to apprehend, arrest, and to transport these to Jerusalem for trial. According to his own testimony he persecuted Christians with great hate. He put men and women in jail and gave testimony against many who were put to death (Acts 22:4-5). Saul as his name implies was a ruthless man who believed he was doing God a service by destroying Christians. Saul was also of the tribe of Benjamin (Philip 3:5). King Saul was from this tribe (1Sam 9:1-2). This was the man Saul was named after. And just as King Saul hated David and tried to kill him, Saul of Tarsus hated Jesus the son of David and wanted to destroy Christians who believed in Jesus as the son of David.

This man Saul was after Gamaliel, the greatest Pharisee that ever lived. He was as smart if not smarter than his teacher. He became a Pharisee of Pharisees (Acts 23:6). No Jewish sect hated Jesus and Christians more than the Pharisees. Now it is important here to know something about this Babylonian sect. There are no Pharisees in the Old Testament. Where did they come from? They were invented in Babylon. The name Pharisee is the same as Pharsi which comes to us from the Persian language. Pharis and Pharisee means simply of Persian origin. When applied to a group of religious Jews who lived in the Persian empire but as a separated people, we get the name Pharisee and the meaning "separated" attached to it. But simply to say Pharisee as the name of a Jew meant a "Persian Jew." The religious beliefs of these Persian Jews is what they brought back to Israel sometime between 200-100BC. They came to Jerusalem and worked their way into religious power against the existing religious leaders that remained of the rebuilding by Ezra and Nehemiah. They developed a political influence in Israel and in Jerusalem that put them in control by the time Jesus was born. These Pharisees brought back to Israel the secret Kabbalah mystical teachings which were called the "traditions of the elders." Modern Kabbalist credit the Pharisees with having their secrets in the first century. They also mention a secret sect called the Iscarri (from which Iscariot comes): who were secret assassins to kill anyone they decided was a threat to their power structure.

Saul was a member of all this. He was on the inside of the most powerful religious party ever known in Israel. He was close to all those in authority. He was used by the Pharisees against Christians. He wanted to be used. He volunteered. He lived for one purpose and that was to make sure Phariseeism survived and Christianity was destroyed.

Behind the mystery Pharisee cult was an ancient god known among the Gentile nations surrounding Israel. This god has several names and titles and this makes it confusing for people to grasp. Even as the true God has different introductory names and titles, so this ancient god has many of the same. I speak here of YHWH which the Babylonian Jews inserted into their newly translated Aramaic scripture scrolls around 500BC known now as the Targum (the Dead Sea Scrolls are an example of  the Babylonian Targum Aramaic text).
ARAMAIC LANGUAGE AMONG THE JEWS – ...Considered Foreign by Ancient Hebrews. Of all Semitic languages the Aramaic is most closely related to the Hebrew, and forms with it, and possibly with the ...Assyrian, the northern group of Semitic languages. Aramaic, nevertheless, was considered by the ancient Hebrews as a foreign tongue; and a hundred years before the Babylonian exile it was understood only by people of ...high officials of King Hezekiah not to speak in Hebrew, but in the "Syrian language," which they alone understood (II Kings xviii. 26; Isa. xxxvi. 11). In the early Hebrew literature an Aramaic expression occurs (Jewish Encyclopedia).

We can easily see how the Pharisee Babylonians were believers in this YHWH god.  This tetragrammaton god became their god. This name of four letters was held in high honor. They developed a religious mystery around them and only allowed the knowledge and pronunciation to those initiated into their secret orders. We can easily see this within the secret teachings of the Kabbalah. We now know this YHWH is a name for the moon god. This same god went by other names such as Ah, Ia, Ya, Ja, Yah, Jah, Iah, Yahwe, Jave, Jove, Yabe, Yave, and so forth. Any combination of these letters fixed on the end of a name would signify this moon god. These letters were added to names of individuals in the Bible to make it appear they also believed in and held this god to be their God. Take Jeremiah for instance. In the Greek Septuagint this name is Jeremias and and in the English KJV he is called Jeremy (Mat 2:17). We can easily see that Jeremy is the same as Jeremi with the "y" having an "i" sounding. Why would Jewish scholars in 280BC write the name of this prophet as Jeremias and then in the Aramaic Targum it comes out Jeremi-ah? By adding "ah" they then formed "iah" which nearly all the scholars claim refers to Yah. It is then we know they have attached an ancient name for the moon god to the name Jeremias (Jeremy). This is the case with all the names ending in "iah." I bring all this out, because Saul of Tarsus was a defender of this YHWH god when he chose to attack Jesus Christ and Christians. Behind his hate, his anger, his zeal to hurt, imprison, and put to death: was his religious love for this YHWH god. Christians were worshipping Jesus as God and he was insane against what he believed was idolatry.

It is impossible for Saul of Tarsus to have hated Jesus and Christians and behind his bigotry was not his YHWH god.  And Christians were not giving his god the same honor and respect he and the Pharisees did. Instead, Jesus was their God. Unless the world understands this Saul of Tarsus and his YHWH god, they will not understand why his conversion to Christianity was the greatest Jewish conversion after the day of Pentecost. The greatest Pharisee rabbi departed from his YHWH god and fell on his knees to the Lord Jesus Christ as his God. If this single occurrence is omitted and ignored, they will not understand why Paul was so hated by his former religious organization. They will not understand why he never once used YHWH as a name to be praised, worshipped, or honored. Saul's conversion was a total change out of the old for the NEW! Now that is a real conversion right there.

The conversion of Saul over to Jesus as his Lord and God was dynamic. It was life changing. He was no longer a Pharisee in the sense of a YHWH Aramaic Babylonian worshipper. On the road to Damascus he had an encounter with Jesus God. When Paul raised ask toward heaven: "who art thou Lord?" He got his answer: "I AM Jesus." The voice from heaven did not say "I am Jehovah." It did not say "I am Yeshua." It did not say: "I am Yahweh." It did not say: "I am Yahshua." It did not say: "I am YHWH (yod hey waw hey). Right here Saul learned that Jesus was Lord. From this moment on when he spoke of the Lord Jesus or the Lord Jesus Christ, it was because of who spoke to him from heaven.

After this Saul preached Christ straightway. What is so beautiful here, is that he used the names and titles "Jesus, Lord Jesus, Christ, and Lord Jesus Christ" 315 times in his preaching, his trial, and his Epistles. To him there was no other name. He did not preach any other name. Who will join Saul in this one Gospel which includes ONE NAME? Or do we go back to Saul's old buddies, the Pharisees and their Aramaic perversions, and try to learn about this YHWH bisexual god and act like we are getting closer to heaven? Why not skip these devils, these serpents, these hypocrites, these who did not know Jesus or his Father, and go straight to Calvary. And there get our name of Jesus God from the Cross. And take up our cross and follow him. If you do this, you will be a Jesus name only man or woman, boy or girl.

Many of you need a conversion. You are religious. You may even be Oneness and Apostolic, but you are still mixed up, deceived into accepting false and fake invented Catholic monk guess names. Or you went back to those devil inspired Jews to get an Aramaic name for Jesus. Or you chose to accept some other substitute fake name for Jesus because some perverters deceived you about how smart they were in the Aramaic Babylonian language claiming it was Hebrew. If any of you believe Aramaic is Hebrew you were deceived right there.

Saul no longer wanted to be named after his tribal forefather king Saul who hated David and tried to kill him. Saul had hated the seed of David Jesus. Saul hated Christians who believed in Jesus as the Messieh seed of David. Something clicked in him around Acts 13:9 and he changed his name to Paulos (Paul---meaning little). And he who considered himself at one time a great defender of the YHWH Pharisee cult, was now a defender of the name of Jesus. And being an Apostle out of due order, past the time of the choosing of Apostles, he considered himself less than all the other Apostles and chose to name himself "little." Now that is humility.

Now we know Saul as Paul and we know he gave up his YHWH Pharisee religion to be a follower of Jesus God only. If you want to know the name of the God Paul hoped to see in the future read Titus 2:13.

I join with this great servant of God. I want to raise my eyes to heaven and call Jesus Lord. I want to straightway preach Jesus as Christ (Messieh) and convince many mightily. I just want to be a little guy. Maybe that is why my mother prophetically called me Gary "PAUL" Reckart. It's ok ya'll to think I am a little no body. I really am. I am the least of all. Because of this I want to be a servant to all. Just ask me to serve you up a delicious meal of Truth and I will do my best to feed you. I promise I will not try to sneak any lies and false names of God on your plate. I will not feed you poison. I want you to be healthy children of God.

Bishop Reckart

Brother David Harp (Secret Bible Code)

Just go read it. Get angry. Then join us to lift up the name of Jesus above all names.

http://thetruenameofjesus.com/?p=39

Jehovah, Yahweh, Yah, Jah et al

This is an alleged copy of Psalms 119-59-64 of the Dead Sea Scrolls written in Aramaic (Babylonian language). You can see where I have pointed an arrow at the tetragrammation inserted (interpolated) into the text and scroll. The interpolation is sloppy. It is not authentic. But many ignorant will accept this as proof YHWH or YHVH is the authentic name of God. No one knows exactly how this was pronounced. It was not until 1270AD that a Catholic monk invented Jehovah for it and then around 1725AD when another monk invented Yahweh. Scholars admit these are guess names.

There are reports that some copies of the Septuagint Greek Old Testament (called the LXX from the 70 who translated it) contained the tetragrammaton also:

In this example the location again there is an inserted interpolated YHWH or YHVH. No one knows the date of this particular alleged copy of the LXX. In fact, we do not even know if it is a copy or if it is a copy of a page from the Aquila retranslation circa 135AD. In an effort to make it appear a valid copy of the LXX some scholars tap their head and say it dates from 50BC to 50AD. And from this claim it was the very text used in the time of Jesus and the Apostles. This is alleged but no one can prove it. But what if this is a copy from a page of Aquila's perverted translation around 135AD requested by Rabbi Akiba who was a confessed antichrist? It this is from Aquila's perversion we can understand why there would be a emphasis on the god of these Jews. It would place the focus not on Jesus as Lord but on some god whose name they supposedly had lost and did not know how to pronounce.

Why do I keep bringing this up? It is because millions claim YHWH or YHVH is the name of God the Father while Jesus is the name of God the Son. In this way, they claim the monk guess names Jehovah and Yahweh are names for God the Father and these names are greater than the name of Jesus the second God of rank. Can this be true? Did the Jews know this alleged God the Father to be the true God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and the other Old Testament men of God? And if this YHWH and YHVH were well known to them as their God the Father, what do we do with the following verses of Scripture:

JOH 5:43 I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.

JOH 8:19 Then said they unto him, Where is thy Father? Jesus answered, Ye neither know me, nor my Father: if ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also.




JOH 14:7 If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him.

Whoever the Father God the Jews claimed to be God, which we know was YHWH or YHVH, Jesus denied this was his Father. Jesus said it clearly they did not know his Father. He could not say this if YHWH and YHVH known to them was his Father. To the simple minded person this is enough proof that the god of the Jews at that time was not the God whom Jesus spoke of as Father.

I have pointed out that neither Jesus or the Apostles ever used the Dead Sea Scrolls or any like kind manuscripts of the Old Testament. The Scriptures they spoke of was the Greek Septuagint and which they quoted nearly 100% of the time or a paraphrase from them. It is in these Greek Scriptures that Kurios (Lord) was translated in over 3,000 places where there is now an attempt to interpolate the tetragrammations YHWH and YHVH. If the original Jewish translators of the LXX recognized Lord (Adonai) as the correct name in these places and translated it Kurios (Greek for Lord), then we have an accurate translation. Not only this, but the fact Jesus and the Apostles used Kurios (Lord) would indicate they accepted and agreed with the translation.

There are attempts to claim Jesus spoke only Aramaic and this cannot be proved. We know Jesus spoke Paleo Hebrew on at least one occasion in Acts 26:14 (in the Hebrew tongue means Paleo Hebrew). We also know that Jesus was raised in an area called Galilee of the Gentiles, and in this region Greek was the bilingual language. It would have been impossible for Jesus not to have known Greek or spoke it. Many of the words Jesus used had Greek connection. My point here is that Jesus no where used any Aramaic translated Old Testament bibles if one even existed. All we have are the Dead Sea Scrolls and there is no evidence these represented an existing Aramaic Old Testament accepted by the Jews.

We are on a search of the name of God in the New Testament. And when we begin this search will we find Jesus or the Apostles using YHWH or YHVH? Jesus already said the Jews did not know his Father. And we already have the text: "ye should have known my Father also (John 14:7)." But the Jews did not know this God. Then in the quoted text, Jesus is very clear that if they had known him they would know who the Father God was. When Jesus said: "henceforth ye know him and have seen him" he was showing the world that he and the Father were one. He was also showing the world they could know the name of God he Father because he came in his Father's name (John 5:43). It is here, we know the name of the Father is Jesus. And when you see Jesus and call him Father, you have just made one of the greatest expressions of worship to God.

Okay, the Jews did not know the name of God and they rejected Jesus' name as the name of God the Father. But what about the Apostles in their preaching and writing of the New Testament? Why in all of the New Testament is the tetragrammation absent? How come YHWH or YHVH is absent and missing? How come when Paul wrote to the Greeks, when John wrote the seven Churches of Greek cities, they never used YHWH or YHVH or inserted these Paleo Hebrew characters into their writings like we find in the Dead Sea Scrolls?

More....

An ancient coin showing the roof of the temple in Jerusalem with the hex star perched over it. This star Remphan represented the god YHWH or YHVH.

More...

We Will Judge Angels

We Will Judge Angels, Written June 13, 2012

1Cor 6:3(a)–Know ye not we shall judge angels.

Col 2:18(a)–Let no man beguile of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels.

One thing the devil has always lusted after is for men and women to worship him. He was so bold about this lust that he actually invited Jesus to worship him:

Mat 4:9–And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.

If Jesus had bowed down and worshipped the devil he would have been worshipping a fallen angel (Thanks Brother Harp).

So we know the devil wants two things: 1) for people of the world to fall down, that is kneel down before him; and 2) worship him. In all satanic rituals both of these two things are done.

It is right here we must join with Jesus. We must refuse to bow down and worship a fallen angel.

Anyone who does not believe the devil is a fallen angel, need not read more.

Jesus revealed the name of God. Now why would he need to reveal anything if the Jews already had God’s name in YHWH? Why reveal a name they already called Jehovah or Yahweh? He would need not to reveal any name of God to them, unless YHWH and all its cognates Jehovah and Yahweh were “NOT” the name of God. Jesus did not reveal YHWH or its cognates as the name of God. What now? Do we follow Jesus or do we follow blind scribes, rabbis, and Talmudic Kabbalist who give us their satanic bisexual god doctrine of YHWH in their bibles (Dead Sea Scrolls included here)?

Here is where YHWH is a vital subject of important. This is a name of the devil because it is the name of an idol god. And all idol gods are called devils (Lev 17:7; Deut 32:17; 2Chron 11:15; Psa 106:37). Satan was a devil when he became an idol god. All idol gods have the same spiritual depravity of satan. This fallen angel got Israel to worship him under many different disguises, images and names. YHWH is associated with these idol gods. The golden calf was called YHWH in Exodus 32:4-5. Check out LORD in verse 5 and you will see it is YHWH and Jehovah (Strongs #3068). This golden calf was a representation of the devil. And this devil idol was called YHWH and Jehovah.

Since we are going to judge fallen angels, we are going to judge the false names of these angels. We are going to judge the tetragrammaton YHWH used by the devil (thanks Brother Harp).

This is a serious subject. Men may justify YHWH and the cognate names born from it, but we will judge it. I am judging it right now. I have the ability to judge the devil, that evil serpent who is a fallen angel. I judge him to be guilty and deserving of eternal hell. I judge his false name of YHWH as being evil. He may have deceived the Jews, but he did not deceive the Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus told us he would reveal the name of God. And he did not reveal YHWH as the name of God. The Jews had this god YHWH for many centuries all the way back to the golden calf. And think about it, Jeroboam put these YHWH calf idols in Bethel (1Kings 12:28-32) and in the tribe of Dan (2Kings 10:29). He ordained priest to officiate at these YHWH alters. And this YHWH was called also Baal (see Strongs #1180 where Baali is a name for Jehovah).

Some of you think we are making a big to do about nothing. You are defending YHWH using the profane writings of Jews, Catholics, and Protestant deceivers. You think if the Jews put it into their Bibles this makes it valid. You think if a Catholic monk invents Jehovah or Yahweh out of it this somehow converts it from a devil name to a name of God.

Here is where the blasphemy comes before us: when men and women say Jesus is YHWH/Jehovah come in the flesh, they are saying a fallen angel came in the flesh (thank you Brother Harp).

Have you people not read Strongs #1943 where “hovah” means ruin and destruction? And you claim this is the second part of the name Je-hovah? Whoever this Je is here he is hovah. And this is not good. This cannot be our God or Jesus.

This is why we must insist that Jesus is not YHWH/Jehovah come in the flesh. We will never admit or confess that Jesus was a fallen angel come in the flesh.

This is why Brother Owens keeps pounding away about YHWH and the monk guess names of Jehovah and Yahweh. This is why Brother Greg and Brother Logos keep telling everyone that this YHWH is not the true God or Jesus.

Jesus told the Jews: “ye neither know me or my Father” (John 8:19). I know the perverters will not like this and attempt to correct Jesus. But Jesus was very adamant here. If the Jews had a god named YHWH and they knew this god, then Jesus could not say they did not know his Father. And he could not say they did not know him, if the Jews had a god named YHWH and Jesus was this god come in the flesh. Because the Jews knew Jesus. Yet they did not know him as YHWH.

In our study of the etymology of the name of Jesus, we are confident Jesus has Jeh as the sounding of “Je.” And we are 100% sure this “Jeh” is identical to the “Jeh” added to the name of Oshea in Numbers 13:16. We are confident this precludes any attempt by any perverter to make the name Jesus mean Yahshua. And if we allow “Yah” or even “Jah” from YHWH, then the name of Jesus would have been Jahsus Christ (thanks Brother Harp).

I conclude this by saying many of us are going to judge fallen angels. Any many of you who refuse to give up YHWH and all the devil names attached to it, we will judge you also.

To us, we are going to lift up the name of Jesus above all names. You who reject us can judge us on that day if we were right.

There is no other name given under heaven among men, whereby we must be saved. Govern yourselves according to your faith in the name of Jesus.

Bishop Reckart

A man God sent

__________________________________

The Jews claim their god YHWH is a bisexual god of male and female.
YHWH and its names Jehova, Jehovah, are the names used in cults to call upon the tetragrammaton god. For instance, in Masonic lodges they use Jehova as the name of the supreme architect of the universe in the master mason degree when they raise up a master mason with the lion's grip. He now becomes a master of the name. The name Jesus is not allowed to be spoken in the lodge. It is not used in any degree. Other cults call on Yod-Hay-Wah-Hay (or Yod-Hay-Vah-Hay) as they kneel before their satanic altars. Who answers them? It is not God. The devil answers them. How come Jesus does not answer them?
We are to do all things in the name of Jesus Christ (Lord Jesus) and this leaves nothing to be done in the name of Jehovah, Yahweh, or YHWH.

Bishop Reckart On Facebook

Bishop Reckart on Facebook.

http://www.facebook.com/#!/acts0412

The temple of YHWH blood

Some shocking things need to be said. The time has come. The contrast must be made. The Truth must be known. The mystery of iniquity must not deceive the very elect. At issue is the war between the YHWH worshippers and the name of Jesus worshippers. We did not start this conflict. We can only be witnesses of that which we know and see. And we have for our testimony the words of Jesus and those of his disciples and Apostles. We need to see what happened for what it was. And then try to understand why in these last days many will be hated for the name of Jesus.

Obviously the temple cult consisting of the Pharisees and Sadducee's, together with the scribes and lawyers, were worshippers of the YHWH god. We know this cannot be the true God. We know this god is not the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus was not the son of YHWH. There is not a single scripture where Jesus called YHWH his father. Obviously, the Jews did not believe YHWH had an only begotten son. This is why they denied their god had a son. Something the Muslims claim also about Allah. Jesus is not the son of Allah either. Their Isa is not the Son of God, he is not the Christ, he did not die on the Cross and he was not resurrected. Their Isa and this name is another Jesus. Anyone who is baptised with this false name Isa has been baptised into a false name. Jews denied Jesus was the Christ, the Son of God and this was the foundation of their belief Jesus was a false messiah (because Jesus claimed to be the Son of God). Even as Jesus was on the Cross these antichrist railed upon him that if he was the Son of God, let God have him (Matthew 27:43).

It may shock some of you and indeed many of you need to be shocked, that their was a reason Jesus referred to God as the Father and did not refer to God in over 200 places in the Gospels as YHWH.
The conflict between Jesus and the temple cult was connected to the distinction of YHWH their god and the God whom Jesus called his Father. Let me say it here just like Jesus said it:

"Then said they unto him, Where is thy Father? Jesus answered, Ye neither know me, nor my Father: if ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also" (John 8:19).

The god of the Jews was YHWH. They knew this god.  But Jesus said they did not know his Father. This is a shocking Truth. They did not know his Father because his Father was not YHWH.

Herein is the understanding of the temple of blood, the shrine of YHWH. The Temple had been hijacked. It had been taken over by a den of thieves. They killed the prophets and then the Lord Jesus Christ. They killed many of the first Christians. The blood of these saints remains there on the temple mount in the soil. No red heifer sacrifice will cleanse this blood away. In a contrast to this temple of blood, we have the Upper Room first Church. The Church of the name of Jesus. And it is in this name Jesus we have the great revelation of God and his name.

It is a fraud and a crime to associate with Jesus the god of the Jews whose name was YHVH. Jesus said they did not know his Father. And this means YHVH was not his Father. Therefore, any name invented or concocted from YHVH or YHWH is not the name of the true God and most certainly not the name of Jesus. This kills all yah names invented by monks and other religious pundits.

I return to the fact Jesus referred to God as his Father and not by YHVH or YHWH. Even in the Lord's Prayer he said: "Our Father which art in heaven." He was not referring to YHVH. He was referring to the true God his Father.

Jesus said no man knew the Son but the Father, and no man knows the Father but the son, and he to whom the Son will reveal him (Luke 10:22).
If the Jews already knew this God Jesus would have nothing to reveal. But they did not know the true God and he would not reveal him to those who worshipped the tetragrammaton god YHWH.

The Jews did not know the God who was the Father of this statement by Jesus. And Jesus clearly said no one would know the Father unless he revealed him to them.  All those who believe in the YHWH god of the Jews are then and will then be as blind and ignorant as they were.

Why must we then go to Jews about God? Why must we go them to learn the name of God? Why is it, we claim to believe in Jesus and then try to make some other false god his Father. YHVH is not the father of Jesus. Jesus is not the only begotten son of YHWH.

We have a choice, join with those of the temple of blood, or join with the Apostles in the Upper Room first Church and stand for the name of Jesus as the name above all names.

Bishop Reckart
Jesus Name Only

http://thejewishjesus.blogspot.com/2013/08/it-is-official-we-now-know.html

Jesus House Prepares For Passover

The Passover of Jesus is just 14 days away. We are preparing here at Jesus House. Here, we set the standard for a great evening of remembering the greatest day of the year.

Below are some pictures of the Temple for Jesus Name.

We here at Jesus House take the Passover of Jesus to our hearts. This is not a ritual. This is the very basis of our salvation faith. To us, it is the history behind Acts 2:38. It is the one celebration that makes us one bread. From the Lord's Table we become one body. We know the early Church celebrated these blessed revelations and tried to transfer them by teaching and preaching.

It is the desire of Bishop Reckart to replace himself with 120 Men of God. Yes, I have a goal to duplicate myself in the hearts of many Men of God. And when I am gone from the scene, there will be many voices to carry on the torch of revelation in the Passover of Jesus.

At Jesus House, we will celebrate a great Passover.

Bishop Reckart wants to pass this blessing on to thousands of others.

Sundown April 7 can be your beginning of a new life of the Cross.

Jesus bless us all,

Bishop Reckart
Created by God, for God

Calendar Passover 29AD

There is massive distortion about the Passover Jesus observed at which he instituted the Communion or Lord's Supper.

The key to unraveling this confusion is to start with the day of the resurrection and work backward. We know the resurrection occurred on the 3rd day after his burial. There are 16 references that verify the 3rd day resurrection. Acts 10:40 stands out very strong: "Him God raised the third day." With this established we can now move to resolve a lot of the corruption, much of which is on purpose. There is no end of liars and distorter's who pleasure their egos to make Truth into lies. This is why I am posting this on the Internet today.

Taking Sunday as the third day, then what we call Saturday night was the third night. Saturday would be the second day. What we call Friday night would be the second night. The day portion of Friday would be the first day. What we call Thursday night would be the first night. This means Jesus was crucified on Thursday. This also means Passover was from sundown Wednesday until sundown Thursday.

There is a lot of confusion if Jesus observed the annual Passover and did he on that evening then institute the annual memorial of his own death? If Jesus did not observe the Passover on the evening it was required, then he violated Exodus 12:24. A violation would result in being cut off from Israel (Exodus 12:15). If Jesus did not observe the exact evening he sinned.

There are many who take mistranslations and try to build a doctrine out of one scripture. This is not a Biblical way to interpret the Word of God.

Considering the foregoing, the lamb was slain on the afternoon of the 14th of Abib. It was then roasted and the other things made ready for the Passover evening observance. They went behind the blood protected doorway before sundown. At sundown began the 15th of Abib and that is the date of the Passover.

I have pointed out for years that Passover is not when the lamb was slain. Even in Egypt, the Passover was not when the lamb was slain. The Passover was at midnight nearly 9 hours after the lamb was slain. And, it was not on the same day at all.

Many try to claim the lamb was slain on the afternoon of the 13th and then eaten on the evening of the 14th. This is so false and a distortion anyone who has an elementary knowledge of the Scripture knows this is plain out stupid.

Some try to build their case on the lamb slain on the 13th and eaten the night of the 14th based upon the Catholic accusation against the Passover observance of the Asian Quartodecimeans who followed the Apostles Paul and John. Quartodecimean is a way of saying 14th. But anyone who knows Jewish traditions know that Jewish time and Roman time are not counted the same. Jewish time ends at sundown and a new day begins. Roman time begins at midnight and ends at midnight. So the Catholics were using Roman time that counted the day to midnight to accuse the Asian Passover Christian observers. The Roman method the day did not end till midnight. Whereas with Jewish time it ended at sundown. It was Catholic error to assume the day did not end till midnight and thought the 14th lasted until midnight. Anyone who uses these errors for doctrine shows just how unlearned, ignorant, and novice they are.

No where did the Asian Churches use the name Quartodecimean to describe themselves. This was a word invented by Catholics to slander the Asian Churches that continued to follow the Apostolic practice that Jesus instituted. The Nicene Council in 325AD is where Constantine and 318 monks voted the Passover observance illegal and established Easter as the day of the resurrection to have priority and authority over the day Jesus died. But Jesus did not give the Communion as a memorial of his resurrection. And anyone who tries that joke is simply reprobate. My point here is, it is novice and illogical, not even Biblical, to build a doctrine on celebration of Passover at sundown the 13th based upon Catholic falsehood and use of the Roman day.

There is no Apostolic Minister in the United States or the world who has held and observed the Passover of Jesus more years than I.  I am the first to write about it. I am the first to restore this beautiful Truth. I am the most widely read writer among Apostolic Ministers and people on this subject. When people first read it they think it interesting. I draw attention to my ministry here only because there are some novices trying to destroy the Truth. And they did not know of the Lord's Passover until about 4 years ago. Then they perverted it and added bapizing babies to it. So do not discount me for boasting a little. It is for the cause of Truth and doctrine that I treasure and hold dearly.

When many see the Truth, they take it into their hearts. They do not try to find one little disagreement and then turn and rend me. The honest in heart will make plans to celebrate the Passover of Jesus regardless of what they think about me.

The distortions are created out of jealousy and to create discord. It is mostly by young novices, trying to interject falsehood to lead people astray. Seasoned men of God do not act this way.

Those who trust in a seasoned Man of God will know what I have written came from God. These novices on the other hand are like those mentioned in Jude 1:13.

One tool you can always use to smoke these perverters out with, is to ask them if they know me, and if they follow my teachings on the Passover. If they say they know me and then say they do not follow my teachings: YOU JUST SMOKED THEM OUT. You are talking to a distorter.

Ok, this year Passover is sundown April 7th. See that you keep it in all your homes or Churches. You are to do this until Jesus comes (1Cor 11:26).

Now some claim that they can use one verse, and one word in that one verse, to build their doctrine and practice of celebrating the Lord's Supper any time they want. They have been using 1Corinthians 11:26 "often" now for years as the authority of their false interpretation. They know it is not Biblical to use one verse or one word to make a doctrine. But in this case, to avoid and to argue against the annual Lord's Passover, they will violate the Biblical principle of using one verse to make a doctrine. Now if you are one of those people, you are in error and you are using falsehood to protect your Catholic interpretation. It was the Catholic church who first used the interpretation of "often" to mean anytime they wanted. This is why they can have the Eucharist several times a day in a Mass.  But, I am here as a witness created by God, to tell you that "often" can and does mean one time a year.

The Passover of Jesus is the most important day of the year for a real Bible believing child of God. I said so. And I speak this from the authority of the revelation of Jesus Christ. As a Bishop I contend and defend this doctrine of the Apostolic Church.

For those good and honest hearts who are reading these words, can I just suggest you ask the Holy Spirit to confirm these things unto you? And when you feel that special tugging, that special warmth of the soul as the words sink way down deep: make a vow to your Savior you will remember the day he died for the world for the rest of your life. Then do it.

Start at sundown April 7th.

Jesus Bless Us All.

Bishop Reckart
Son of the Blood

LIKE

Passover of Christ Facts

Jesus House Passover Table

Let me talk a little about the Passover of Jesus. Paul said in 1Cor 5:7 that Christ our Passover was sacrificed for us.

He was not our New Year's eve black-eye pea good-luck sacrifice. He was not our Sunday or first Sunday sacrifice. He was not our revival sacrifice.

He was our Passover sacrifice.

Now Passover designates a certain Jewish month, day, and time. And as all of you know, Exodus 12:14, 17, 23-24 says the Israelites were to observe the Passover FOREVER.

Passover was protection from the destroyer. They observed it behind blood protected doorways. Once inside they were not to go out of the house (Ex 12:22). Once behind the blood protected doorway they were exempt from the death angel.

This has great application to Paul's statement of Christ being our Passover. Only an idiot would deny Christ observed the old Passover. And only an idiot would deny he instituted his own Passover observance on that same night. We do not need lots of scripture here to prove we should observe the Lord's Supper on the Jewish Passover evening. It is right there in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Four different Apostolic witnesses recorded the Passover of Christ evening and at different years. While it was one historical event they recorded it individually so there would be no dispute about when to observe it. This does signify there were four witnesses to the fact Passover was the evening Jesus gave the Lord's Supper Communion for an annual memorial. That is settled. I said so!

And it is also settled that the Asian Churches held the annual Passover of Christ all the way up to the Nicene Council. It was at the Nicene Council that Easter was voted in by the monks and the Passover of Christ on the Jewish Passover was made illegal.

Representing 33 1/2 years of holiness

Now what I want to speak about right here is the fact of the holiness and kindness of Christ. All of the holiness and kindness of Jesus is represented in the Communion Cup. The Communion Cup is a sacred memorial to the holy shed blood of Jesus. His blood was shed on Passover. That is why Paul could say Christ was our Passover sacrifice. He said this 30+ years after Jesus instituted the fulfillment replacement Passover. So, in effect, Jews who continued to observe the Passover of Jesus on Passover are keeping the Exodus "forever" commandment. As the Israel of God, we know what night to observe the Lord's Supper. The blood shed on Passover is the reason we observe the Communion Cup. We are not ignorant here. We know the blood of Jesus stops the destroyer. We know the blood of Jesus exempts us from all future wrath of God for past sins. We know Jesus is the door and the blood on his head, his hands, and his feet are what we hide behind in the house of God. And we will never leave the house of God until the morning comes when Jesus shall exodus us out of the world and up to meet him in the clouds. And it will happen after tribulation. After the antichrist which Pharaoh typifies. After the plagues which are a type of the plagues of the seals, trumpets, and vials. All after the antichrist of the nations persecute the endtime people of God, just as the Israelites were fleeing the antisemitism of Pharaoh and his armies. As the Jews are reminded of antisemitism on Passover, we are reminded of antichristism on our Passover of Christ evening. But like the Jews, we refuse to be victims when we can flee and escape. Passover to the Jews is a reminder of antisemitism and its ugly hate. And the Passover of Christ is a reminder to us of the antichrist and their ugly hate against Jesus and the persecution of the members of the first Church.

When we take the Cup to our lips we are supposed to be sealing our faith to be in agreement with Jesus and willing to share in the antisemitism and antichristism he suffered. We also put the Cup to our lips to testify of the kindness of God we have received by the remission of our sins. When we drink, we seal to our faith the very atonement that gives us holiness. And that holiness came to us on a specific month and a specific day, PASSOVER. I said so!

The Cup is also the New Testament in his blood (Matthew 26:28). There is NO OLD TESTAMENT IN THIS CUP. So those of you trying to bring people and the Church back under the Law are in violation of the Lord's Supper. You are eating and drinking unworthy. So just stop it. If you do not, many of you will become sickly and die lost. Just stop it. Get a revelation of GRACE, and understand holiness in its proper place in the blood of Jesus, water baptism, and inward and outward manifestations.

In addition, no one can find in the Bible the observance of Communion on Christmas, New Year's Eve, St. Valentine's Day, St. Patrick's day, Easter morning, at a wedding, or at a revival service. No one will find a Catholic mass in the Bible. You cannot find the Lord's Supper celebrated on a Sunday morning or a Sunday night. Jesus simply did not set that pattern. And he did not set an "any time" you want pattern.

Why are all these days and evenings practiced and yet they refuse to observe it on the very night Jesus instituted it?

Jewish Christian Holiness

When I first started writing about restoring the Passover of Jesus back in the early 80s, I knew of no one who held the annual evening according to the Jewish calendar. After it was revealed to me, I restored it to my own Church. And since then, I am the only Apostolic writer in over 30 years to expound on the beauty and the truths surrounding the Passover of Christ annual celebration. Now there are hundreds around the world, perhaps even a few thousand who celebrate the annual Passover of Christ in their homes and in their Churches. But, this has not been without hate, enemies, and gainsayers trying to protect their "oft" unscriptural days.

This year, many souls around the world will gather after sundown April 7th and the Passover of Christ will receive great honor and respect.

You can honor your own birthday on the right day and month, but you cannot honor the sacrifice of Christ on the right day and month? You can hold your Christmas on a specific evening; You can celebrate New Year's eve; You can celebrate St.Valentine's Day and St.Patrick's Day; You can dress up in pomp and fashion for Easter Sunday; and then tell me YOU DO NOT OBSERVE MONTHS, DAYS, MOONS, and so forth. Some of you are so filled with hate against the Lord's Passover, you will accept your own delusions and your own lies and replace reality with fiction.  There is something wrong with that picture.

For all you great people of God will will observe the Passover of Christ, God bless you. You have the revelation. It will be beautiful to you. You will see it. Your spirit will agree with my spirit, that the Passover of Jesus is a wonderful evening of holiness and great joy. You will not be driven from the Lord's Table by accusers of the Brethren, some temple or church cult opposing you, or by the Judas ones.

This year set the Passover Table. Prepare the unleavened bread and the wine. Place the Word of God ON YOUR PLATE. Open it to the New Testament page. Let's have Passover. And then let us complete the Feast with footwashing where we bless each other to follow and walk in the footsteps of our Shepherd.

The rest, well, get mad if you want, spout off your anger at us, but you will not change us back to your black-eye pea night, your guess days and nights, or your unscriptural whim days: ...even by using "oft".

Christ Our Passover Is Sacrificed For US and we LOVE HIM!
________________________________
PS Is it biblical to build a doctrine out of one word in one scripture? Isn't that what the "oft" anytime doctrine is all about?
_______________________________
For those who ask: yes, if you just show up at the Passover without first contacting Pastor Reckart you will not be allowed into the service.

Passover of Jesus 2012

The annual celebration of the Passover of Jesus will begin at sundown on April 7th.

From sundown Friday until sundown Saturday will be Abib 14. On Saturday Abib 14 the lamb was killed and all things were made ready for the passover at midnight when the angel flew over the homes of the Israelites. It was after sundown the Israelites ate the Passover. This means they ate it on the evening of the 15th. On this night the unleavened bread was served. And on this night began the seven (7) days of unleavened bread.

Now there are two calendars: the Jewish one and the Catholic Gregorian monk one. Do not confuse use of the Gregorian calendar. Do not think April is the same as the month of Abib. The Jewish month does not begin with the first day of April. Many are confusing these. Abib is the first month of the Jewish year. April is the fourth month of the Gregorian Catholic year.

I have given the true date above.

Many are perverting the evening of the Passover and changing the date. Do not follow these perverters.

Passover begins at sundown in Jerusalem on April 7th. From there it circles the globe to the west hour by hour and until it is over 24 hours away.  All nations west of the International Date Line, the Passover is April 8th.

Passover April 7, 2012 at sundown.

Bishop Reckart
Made by God, for God
_____________________________________

Special Note

Do not follow the calendars created by the tetragrammaton cult groups. You will know them by use of Yahweh or Yahuwah or some such like.

Do not follow the calendars created by the Jehovah's Witnesses or the Catholic church.

These will confuse you because they either do not use Jerusalem time or their calculations of the time the new moon and the full moon is counted is false.

Some Jews have false information on the correct evening to observe the Passover. Some begin at sundown the 13th of Abib/Nisan. This is false, the lamb must be slain on the 14th not the 13th. Anyone who has any date for the Passover that does not agree it begins after sundown on April 7, 2012 is false.

Passover begins in Jerusalem. No one can correctly observe Passover until after it is correctly observed on the correct night in Jerusalem.

Correct month (Abib)
Correct evening (14th after sundown)
Correct time of the day (evening after sundown)
On the full moon (moon must be full on Passover evening)
On the 15th day of Abib which began at sundown.
On the first day of the seven days of unleavened bread
Everyone west of 180 degree longitude to Jerusalem will observe Passover one day later on the Gregorian calendar, but it will still be Abib 15 and Passover according to the Biblical calendar.

Snakes In The House

Jacob prophesied of his son Dan, that he would be like a serpent. Indeed, later on the whole tribe of Dan departed from God and worshipped calf gods. This tribe became like a serpent in the house of Israel. And this tribe is missing from the number of the tribes in the book of Revelation.

Moses made an image of a serpent and put it upon a pole and everyone who had been bitten by the fiery serpents in the wilderness could look thereon and be healed. Later on, several Israelites departed from the true God and began to worship the serpent as a god. They worshipped these serpent gods in the houses of their worship in the high places. Snake worship in the high places was part of the Baal worship.

Solomon said: a serpent will bite without enchantment and a babbler is no better. A babbler is a serpent in the house. The effect of a babbler is that his/her words are like poison. They can be deadly. When there is a babbler in the house, there is a snake in the house.

It is a fact that in the winter time most snakes will get cold and stiff, frozen like. If you take one of these snakes that look like they are dead into your house: as soon as they warm up they are trouble. Any time a person becomes trouble in a church, you can be sure there is a snake in the house that thawed out. What is worse, is when other ministers involve themselves with snake members of other churches and thaw them out.

When Jesus came to Jerusalem he found snakes in the temple. He found serpents in the house of God. Even John the Baptist prophesied of these serpents and generation of vipers. They had control of the temple. It had become a den of serpents. And it was from within this snake den that the prophecy of Genesis 3:15 took place. Out of this den of snakes would come the attack to bruise the heels of Jesus on the Cross. When the temple cult of snakes cried "away with him, crucify him" it was the hissing of the serpents at work.

Then we find in Revelation 12 the serpent chasing the woman who birthed the man-child. He chases her out of her home into the wilderness. But he never did get this fangs on her. He never caught her. She escaped from him. While the serpent hunted for her to kill her, she escaped.

Is it any wonder the serpent is bound for 1,000 years as Jesus comes to the earth and sets up his house for the millennial? What better way to keep the serpent, the devil, from Jerusalem at last: but to throw him in a bottomless pit and there seal him for 1,000 years. For 1,000 years the serpent will not be in Israel, will not be in Jerusalem, will not be any where in the world. And with the serpent out of the house there is peace. Perfect peace.

When there is a snake in the house, it is best to isolate the rascal. Get that varmint away from people. And if the serpent does not flee when you open the door, go get a garden hoe and take off its head.

Do not let a snake in your house.

Keep demons out of your house.
Keep demons out of your body.

If you are troubled by the devil, learn how to put the snake out of your house.

There will be no peace until the serpent is gone.

Even as Jesus will have perfect peace for 1,000 years with the devil gone: you can have perfect peace if you will cast the devil out of the house.

and,

oh by the way,

when you allow anyone to bring a snake into the house, be it a preacher, a friend, or a family member: it is time to reconsider who you allow in your house. They tell me that snakes live where they can feed. The devil feeds on people. Have you been devil's food? How else does the devil devour us? Snakes go where a habitat is made for them. To get rid of snakes do away with the habitat that invited them. Or they tell me that the product of hell, sulphur, if spread around makes snakes flee. Maybe the fact snakes do not like sulphur is an indication the devil does not like the lake of fire. Snakes do not like fire period. So, stay on fire for God and there will be no snakes around. And if one shows up, put the fire of the Holy Ghost on that snake and it will flee. This is one of the keys of pastorialship. When a snake is in the congregation, all he has to do is get the fire of the Holy Ghost moving and the snakes will hit the door. :)

Bishop Reckart
Made by God, for God

Baptism for the dead

The Mormon baptisms for the dead is one of the biggest religious hoaxes ever pulled on people.

Some years ago while doing genealogy research on my own family I ran across a Mormon baptism for a dead person.

Now Mormon baptisms for the dead is supposed to save that person from the fires of hell and from eternal punishment. This Mormon hoax out does the Catholic hoax of burning candles for the poor lost souls in purgatory who are suffering in the fires of hell. But, people who cannot bear to accept some relative or friend will be eternally lost, will accept these hoaxes and believe them. This is not just a small isolated hoax. Mormons are doing this all over the world. There have been millions and millions of these hoax baptisms.

One thing that cannot be found in the New Testament is any baptisms for dead lost sinners. It is simply missing. Where then did the Mormons come up with this hoax?

It is a perverted interpretation of 1Cor 15:28-29:

"And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all.
Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? Why are they then baptized for the dead?"

The danger here of the Mormons is building a doctrine on one verse. And then building a doctrine on a perverted interpretation of that verse.

Being baptized for the dead has nothing to do with dead loved ones or friends. Being baptized for the dead has to do with Jesus himself. It is into his death, burial, and resurrection we are baptized. This is the one and only baptism for the dead. And if Christ be not raised from the dead, then our faith and baptisms are all in vain. Why then if they are vain would baptisms into Jesus death (his being dead), have any value or worth?

And that all things are put under him, means all our sins are put under the love of Jesus, and under the shedding of his blood. And all sins put under him are also considered under him because it was God who planned for all sins to be put under the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ. It is only when our sins are put under him that we can have a reunion and fellowship with God. And it is only when this has taken place that God may be all in all. There is no God complete in all, unless all sins of these people are put under the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ. This makes our baptism into the death of Jesus our salvation (Acts 2:38 is not a ritual, you need to understand this people).

So, there is no baptism for dead unsaved people and for criminals as the Mormon hoax promises.

Now, the person who I found that the Mormons saved was ADOLPH HITLER.

Is this a joke? Hitler saved from the fires of hell because of some Mormon in London, England appearing at a Mormon temple saying he is Adolph and has come for baptism! This is a charade and a hoax.

And the Mormon person who was baptized for Hitler, filled all the documents with Salt Lake City and they recorded them. Adolph Hitler is now a Mormon priest of Melchizedek. He is now saved and a member of the Mormon LDS church. Adolph is now a holy and saved Latter Day Saint.

Get a load of that.

Jews should be outraged. I am outraged with religious shams like this.

Mormons can be baptized for all the world's criminals and try to empty hell, but it is all a hoax.

He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved (Mark 16:16).

No one can believe and be baptized after they are dead.

And, a person must be saved before they die.

And if they are not saved before they die, it is prima facia evidence the person did not believe and was not baptized according to Acts 2:38.

Now, all these Mormon hoax baptisms are additionally fake and false because the proxy baptizee is baptized with the words Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.  They are not baptized in the name of Jesus Christ per Acts 2:38. Even if they chose to start using Acts 2:38 they would have to make all the prior baptisms in the titles invalid. And to do this and require all baptisms to be done over, would cause the ruin of the Mormon church. There is no way they can do it.

I can tell all of you this: not a single person in hell fire as been released from that torment because of any Mormon hoax baptism. And no Mormon can prove a single soul has been pulled from hell fire because of their sham baptisms.

My advice is for everyone to stay away from the Mormon hoax religion.

Bishop Reckart
Made by God, for God