WHAT I HAVE SAID - I AM 100% RIGHT

What I have said:

There is no such thing as a Hebrew language.
I have proved that what is called the Hebrew language is in fact two Gentile languages. The first is Phoenician which is called Paleo-Hebrew. The second is Babylonian Aramaic which is falsely called Biblical Hebrew. I have proved that neither of these were the language of Adam, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, or Moses. While I am called an anti-semite because I say there is no such thing as a Hebrew language, no one has ever proved me wrong. And no one ever will. Paleo-Hebrew came into existence about 1200-1000BC. That does not even go back to the flood. Babylonian Aramaic also only goes back to this same time period. Adam did not speak this Aramaic they call Biblical Hebrew. And although Strong's Exhaustive Concordance is held by many to be ordained and inspired by God: the Old Testament Aramaic (Chaldean) words are in fact from profane Gentiles. It is one big hoax, a big fat lie, to call this Biblical Hebrew and pass it off as the language God gave to Adam.

I have proved that in the days of Jesus there existed three bibles. The oldest was a copy of the Paleo-Hebrew that was allegedly kept in the temple in Jerusalem. Allegedly this was the bench mark bible all translations had to match. This bible was apparently destroyed in 70AD when the temple was burned by Titus. No one has seen this bible or any part of it. God did not preserve it. God did not preserve one jot or one tittle.

I have proved that the rabbis around 300BC, by their own testimony, translated the Paleo-Hebrew bible into Babylonian Aramaic. There are so many scholars who accept this date there is no reason for me to argue against it. This Babylonian Aramaic bible was in the Gentle language of Babylon. Why was it translated into this Gentile language? The reason is, most Jews at that time no longer could read or understand the older Paleo-Hebrew. When the Jews were carried away to Babylon around 606BC, they slowly began to speak the Aramaic language. And after raising their children in this Gentile kingdom for two and three generations (100 years), they could not speak this tongue any longer. All they could speak was the Babylonian Aramaic. So around 300BC the majority spoke Aramaic and so a bible was made for them. The only problem here with this Aramaic bible, was the rabbis interpolated into it YHWH in over 6,000 places. This YHWH god (Yaaveh/Yaaweh) was the chief god of the Babylonia Assyrian pantheon. The rabbis equated this chief god with their God and made them one. This is why in the Aramaic bible YHWH became the god of the Jews. This god was not known by Adam, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Moses, or even king David. This tetragrammaton (four letters) was replaced by LORD all in caps in the King James Version. This is one of the biggest hoaxes in all humanity. This god YHWH is not the God referred to by Jesus as Father. The Aramaic bible also was kept in the temple in Jerusalem. The only bible used in the synagigues and in the temple in Jerusalem, was the Greek Septuagint. Since 280BC the Jews loved this bible. Most Jews at that time after being conquered by Alexander the great, spoke Greek and named their children by Greek names. This explains why so many Jews had Greek names from 330BC on to the day of Jesus. In 70AD the last copy of the Babylonian Aramaic was taken to Rome by Titus and there it was destroyed or lost. No one has seen it since the time of the parade of triumph of Titus in Rome. Did God purposely allow this Babylonian bible to be lost? How come God did not preserve it? Attempts to reconstruct this Aramaic bible was ongoing among rabbis until around 800AD rabbi Ben Ezra we are told was successful via the Masoretic scribes to reconstruct an Aramaic bible. How we are not told, only that they did.  

Once reconstructed they then added vowel points to try and recover how this language was once spoken in the days of Jesus. This was all a guess. The vowel points have been a great confusion and many consider them mostly false. The modern Masoretic bible called the Biblical Hebrew Bible was not translated from the original Paleo-Hebrew. And it was not translated from the Babylonian Aramaic of 300BC or that in the Temple in 70AD. What we have is an invented rabbi bible. The question comes up, why did God lose every jot and every tittle of both the Paleo-Hebrew and Babylonian Bibles? Someone has to answer this. Maybe you will ignore or avoid this question because it cuts hard across the rabbi fables we have been told about the bible. And it cast great doubt and suspicion on the Old Testament we now have in the King James Version, taken from this rabbi invented bible.

I have proved that Greek is Paleo-Hebrew written in reverse. That the sound of the Paleo-Hebrew letters are preserved in Greek. I have proved that to take the letter symbol sounds of Babylonian Aramaic and place these upon Paleo-Hebrew is not only a fraud, it is a massive hoax spread by over 12 centuries of bible translators. The most massive hoax is found in the King James Version translator notes: "Newly Translated out of the Original | tongues: & with the former Translations | diligently compared and revised."  This is false. The Old Testament was not translated out of the original Paleo-Hebrew because it no longer existed. And it was not translated out of the original Babylonian Aramaic existing in the days of Jesus, it no longer existed. The Old Testament was translated out of the rabbi Ben Ezra invented Masotetic text. While many have heard of the Masoretic rabbis who allegedly were working in Israel to make another Jewish bible, they have never been told who these Masoretic rabbis were. They were Babylonian trained rabbis who hated Jesus Christ and the Christian Church. Why should we go back to rabbis for an invented bible when we can go back and get the Greek bible Jesus and the Apostles used  and was used in all of the synagogues?

I have proved from several sources that Jesus did not use or accept the Babylonian Aramaic bible. I have proved and most scholars agree, that Jesus used the Greek Septuagint translated bible. This Greek language bible was translated from Paleo-Hebrew around 280BC by special miracles of God and by men who knew Paleo-Hebrew and Greek perfectly. This is the bible Jesus used and quoted from in the New Testament. Immediately we see a conflict in our King James Version bible, because the Old Testament is translated from the rabbi Masoretic invented Aramaic bible. And the New Testament in Greek quotes Jesus and the Apostles using the Greek Bible. When you compare New Testament quotes of Old Testament scriptures they do not match what is in the Old Testament that came from Aramaic. This shows us there is a contradiction between the Aramaic invented text and the New Testament received Greek text. As Christians we accept the Greek New Testament OVER THE ARAMAIC OLD TESTAMENT. What bible did Jesus use? I have proved from the quotes of scholars that Jesus used the Greek Septuagint. I have also proved that the King James translators in their notes admit Jesus and the Apostles used the Greek text. If Jesus never called the Babylonian Aramaic bible "scripture" why should we? What he called "scripture" was the Greek bible. So should we.

I have proved by use of scholars that YHWH is four letters that did not exist in the Paleo-Hebrew or Babylonian Aramaic bible. There are different symbols used to replace these four Latin letters. When someone says ancient Hebrew had no letter J symbol, well they did not have YHWH letter symbols either. I have proved that YHWH are letters used in all the black satanic arts of mysticism and witchcraft. Anyone can research this. YHWH comes with the HEX, the six-pointed star that has nothing to do with king David. It is called the seal of Solomon and is also tied to satanism, witchcraft, and mysticism. YWHW and the HEX go together. I have proved that the name of Jesus does not in any way descend from or contain YHWH. I have proved the name of Jesus cannot be a Babylonian Aramaic name or he had a Gentile name. Any name in Aramaic is not a Hebrew name. Those who claim Jesus had to have a Hebrew name and then use the Gentile Babylonian Aramaic language to get it, are spreading a big hoax. This makes Yahshua and Yahshuah both false names.

I have proved that both Jehovah and Yahweh, were invented by Catholic monks deep into mysticism and witchcraft. I have proved no one knew the name Jehovah before 1260-1280AD. It was not in any bible before that time. It was not known by Jesus or the Apostles. It is not found one time in the New Testament. It is missing in heaven in the book of Revelation. It is an impossibility for it to exist the seven (7) times it is found in the present King James Version Masoretic Aramaic text. There is no way Abraham, Moses, David, or Isaiah knew this name because it did not exist in their times. I have proved that Jehovah and Yahweh are both invented devil names God had nothing to do with. God does not work through satanic cults to reveal his name.

This cuts hard across those who scream they are the true Jehovah's Witnesses (Stoneking and company). It cuts hard across all those cookie cutter bible school graduates of the UPC, PAW, PAJC, ALJC, et al: when they claim Jesus is Jehovah come in the flesh. I have given scripture that shows we must confess Jesus Christ has come in the flesh and anyone who does not confess this is anti-christ (2John 1:7). How dare we use the monk invented names Jehovah and Yahweh and tie Jesus to these names and gods that did not exist in his day?

For sure, Jesus is the Old Testament God manifested in the flesh, but this God NEVER had a name called Jehovah or Yahweh. Cookie cutter bible school graduates who espouse and preach Roman Catholic names for God must fall on their knees and repent and rise to preach the name of Jesus Christ ABOVE ALL NAMES. They must be "solo Jesus Christ" and no more YHWH, Jehovah, Yahweh, or Yahshua.

I have proved that many modern Oneness Pentecostals are still so wrapped up in Catholic traditions they are correctly Pentecostal Catholics. They hate being called this, but what else are they when they practice Catholic inventions like Christmas, New Year's Eve, St. Valentine's Day, St. Patrick's Day, Easter, and scream halleluyah to Jehovah and Yahweh? How can any Oneness Pentecostal who celebrates these with Rome say they are not Pentecostal Catholics? It hurts their feelings to admit they are Pentecostal Catholics. Rather then admit they are, they retaliate with hate, anger, blasphemy, lies, slander, and use any method of reproach known to man to attack me. What is the purpose of this? The purpose is to keep people in Pentecostal Catholicism. It is to keep people in their religious organization. It is to keep people in their mega churches and tell them these pagan practices are not pagan any more because the General Superintendent says they aren't. So, people accept the opinion of a Pentecostal Oneness little pope over the Word of God. I am right on this and anyone who believes the truth will know I am right.

There are many other things I am 100% right on. I know I have lots of enemies. My hate mail is rather larger. I would say presently I have over 500 enemies on Facebook. But will I cave in? No, because I am right.

It is my motive and goal, my purpose in life: to prove the name of Jesus Christ is the name of God. The name of the Father is Jesus (prove that false). The name of the Son is Jesus (prove that false). And the name of the Holy Ghost is Jesus (prove that false).

And that there is no name EVER given under heaven above the name of Jesus Christ (prove this false).

I have openly debated and defended the name of Jesus Christ since 1993 and I have never lost a debate. If you want to debate me "IN PERSON IN FRONT OF YOUR CHURCH" and deny the name of Jesus is above all names, I will come there. If you are not a Pastor do not even bother. I only debate men who have shown they can pastor a church.

Jesus Christ is the name above all names.

Bishop Reckart
A Man God Made