Friday, June 27, 2014

Blog Changed To Private

This blog has been changed to private. If you have been added back here, you will have rights to post. Make sure you do not give your login information to anyone to use or you will be deleted.

This blog will remain private for a very long time. I see no value in feeding those whose only purpose to come here is to find something to attack me and ignore the abundance of truth and important bible studies. Please honor your acceptance here by not copying anything and posting it on another web page or on any Face Book page. Do not add links to any page here. Please also honor your membership by not discussing anything hereon on your own Face Book pages or blogs.

One you have been accepted here, please email me that you have been able to access the studies.

Thanks,

Bishop Reckart
A Man God Made

Monday, June 23, 2014

Lift Up Your Eyes, The Harvest Is Ready

ACT 28:27 For the heart of this people is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes have they closed; lest they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.

ACT 28:28 Be it known therefore unto you, that the salvation of God is sent unto the Gentiles, and that they will hear it.
_______________________

When religious people will no longer receive the Truth, Jesus will turn us to the heathens who have never heard. In Paul's case, these Gentiles had never heard but he said they would hear it.

I like that. When one door closes because they have waxed gross, ears are dull of hearing, eyes they shut, do not want to understand in their heart, and be converted, and be healed: it is time to look for an open door among the heathen in places they have never heard. I like that. You leave the ones who don't want it and reach for new fresh souls that do.

I like this. Paul shows me how to respond when people close the door on the Truth.

Thank you Jesus, Thank you Jesus....

Today Good Blessings From King Jesus

My wife, Sister Reckart went through another dialysis surgery today and Jesus was there with her all the way. The doctor said she would do fine. And she did. she was in surgery for two and a half hours. After this she went to recovery and was out in two hours and in her private room. She was experiencing some pain but after given a pain pill she went off to sleep and slept good for several hours. She needed that. She was uptight all last night and did not sleep well at all. Very nervous and scared. I prayed for her several times. She did sleep a little. But we were up at 4am to prepare for out trip to the hospital needing to be there and checkin by 5:30am.

She is resting now very good. I will bring her home tomorrow for her recovery. Only bad thing is she must have another surgery in 4-8 weeks. Then she should be good to go for quite a long time.

I apologize to everyone I am supposed to visit that my coming is delayed. I must take care of home base first. I do appreciate all of your prayers. The effectual fervent prayers of faith still work. Jesus hears us.

I will be seeing many of you before the year is out, Jesus willing. There are several new open doors that I must go through for my King. While some doors have closed, other doors have opened. Jesus knows just what to do, right on time.

So, Sister Reckart is doing great, thanks to her Lord Jesus Christ.

Pastor Reckart
A Man Who Believes In The Name Of Jesus Christ

Sunday, June 22, 2014

PATRIPASSIANISM

Patripassian

The Wiki article on Patripassian has been corrupted by trinitarians and ignorant Oneness proponents. I am amazed that any Oneness would divide Jesus into two persons: the Father and the Son, and claim the Father as a person did not experience the rejection of the Jews and the suffering of Jesus upon the Cross.

I am a Patripassian. I know what Patripassians believe. I am not a trinitarian and I am not a Oneness two-god. I am a Monarchian. I follow Noetus, Praxeas and Sabellian. I follow the Apostles. The following note was attached to the Wiki article on Patripassianism after the trinitiarians and rouge Oneness butchered it and put lies into it.

Are you a Patripassian? Would you openly confess it if you were. Read below and see if you are Patripassian, trinitarian, or a Oneness two-god.
___________________________
Patripassian (Wikipedia Notes--you can Google "Reckart Patripassianism:)

I am not sure who the person is who is responsible for putting a lot of lies in this Wiki subject. It is not only unfounded slander, it is an outright sin of bearing false witness. The hate and bigotry that is spewed is easily seen. If you are that person you should be ashamed. You will go to no lengths to post lies. When lies must be used to slander, they can never do trinitarianism a favor. This Wiki subject should not be a place to vent your hate.

This name was first used by Tertullian against the Monarchians (Modalist) when he became a trinitarian Montanist. The Monarchians believed the Father suffered as the Son. They base this belief upon the statement of Jesus that it was the Father in him that did the works he performed. This was added to the statement that the Father departed from the body of the Son upon the Cross, where-upon Jesus cried: "My God, My God, why hast thou forsaken me." The Father was in the Son up to this forsaking moment. Only a deceiver would claim the Father did not experience the sufferings of the Son during the time he was in the body of the Son.


The Monarchians did not claim the Father died. They did claimed the Father suffered with the son on the Cross until the moment Jesus cried "My God, My God, why hast thou forsaken me." The false allegations by trinitarians are not proven to be true. They are nothing but copy, cut, and paste hate rants of trinitarians against the Oneness people.

“Kallistos tried to find a compromise formula in this Christological confusion. Father, Son and Logos, he held, are all names of “one indivisble spirit.” Yet Son is also the proper designation of that which was visible, Jesus; while the Father was the spirit in Him. This presence of the Faher in Jesus is the Logos. Kallistos was positive that the Father did not suffer on the cross, but suffered with the sufferings of the Son, Jesus; yet the Father “after He had taken unto Himself our flesh, raised it to the nature of deity, by bringing it into union with Himself, and made it one, so that Fahter, and Son must be styled one God" (History of the Christian Church, Williston Walker, 1949; page75).


The accusation of Patripassian to mean the Father died when the Son died is false. Modalist have never said this. They have been accused of saying this by lying Catholic monks. Other trinitarians accepting the lies of the papacy spread the same hate.

Dr. Gary Reckart has explained what the Patripassians believed. It is time for trinitarians to allow the Oneness Monarchians to explain what they mean by "patripassian" and Dr. Reckart has done that. Has anyone proven the Father was not in the Son? Has anyone proven the Father forsook the body of the Son before he began his sufferings? Isn't it time for trinitarians to end the centuries long libel, hate, and bigotry against Modalist and confess with Pope Calixtus the Father did suffer in the body of the Son?

Bishop Reckart
Defending Patripassianism Like No Other Living Soul Today

Saturday, June 21, 2014

Holy Pole Religions Of Ancient Civilizations

Ever since Charles Taze Russell took off his Masonic apron and decided he would make a new religion based upon the cult name Jehova and the central use of a holy pole or poles (columns), many have been led to accept the monk invented name Jehova(h) and turn to hate the use of the Roman cross to represent Christianity or the death of Jesus.

Russell initiated a hateful attack against the use of the cross claiming it was used by ancient pagan religions and had no place in Christianity. He then claimed by misused of the Greek word "stauros" that Jesus was crucified on a pole, a stake, a holy pole. Since 1830 until now, there have been many who have accepted both the name Jehovah and this holy pole doctrine. If you are not aware of the two holy poles or columns in a masonic lodge, or not aware of the use of these two holy poles in cult orders: it is time you learn. But you must do some study and research on your own. I am giving you enough information to begin.

What has amazed me in all this manufactured hate of the cross, is the anger people use against you if you disagree with them. One man threatened he would take me down. Have at it. So far after contacting nearly all of my friends on Facebook, and spreading the JW doctrine against the emblem of the cross, he has been successful. I have lost a lot of friends just over the Cross of Christ. But take me down? No one will take me down. Jesus has me secure. I have no worry in that area.

I have decided it is time to deal with this holy pole doctrine. No one else in the world has, or I doubt will: unless they take from what I will present and try to make some bold revelation to make a name for themselves. But, that is ok with me. I just want people to know that the holy pole was used more in ancient pagan religions than they ever used the emblem of the cross or figures similar to it. What I have observed is that no one as of yet to my knowledge has ever produced any proof of worship of a cross emblem nor have they attempted to tell us what that cross emblem represented. Oh, there is one case where they claim along with Alexander Hislop that the cross in the form of a T was used to represent Tammuz. But did they worship this letter "T" as they claim?  I decided over 35 years ago to go back to the alphabet of the Babylonians in the time Tammuz would have lived, and there is no symbol "T" in that alphabet. Go check it for yourself. So who is making up these crafty lies? Hislop, others? Even if you check out the "tau" of these ancient alphabets, said to be the first letter of the name of Tammuz, you will see they are not in the form of the Christian cross. Was Tammuz even spelled in those days with a letter "T"? The answer is no. But if the JWs say the cross represents Tammuz, people go nuts to cast down all use of the Cross.

I want to show you many images of use of the ancient holy pole. It was transferred to columns, pedestals, and other uses. You will understand as you view them. Why would a person hate the cross as a pagan emblem (so they say), and then replace it with a holy pole emblem? I did not put them in any particular order.

Here goes:


























There are other uses of the holy pole. There are magic rods used by witches, warlocks, magicians, and even modern Pentecostal rod dancers.











So many uses of the holy poles.

Let me say this, if you do not worship a cross, if you use it only for a emblem representing the death of Jesus Christ, you have not committed any sin. Do not allow the Jehovah Witness doctrine of Charles Russell cause you to hate the Cross of Christ. If you want to spread that Jehovah Witness false doctrine that Jesus was crucified on a holy pole, you do it, I am not.

Hate me if you want. Destroy all my friends, I do not care. I am a follower of Jesus Christ, and I have taken up my cross to follow him.

If you want to kill me, aim for the Cross on my back.

Bishop Reckart
A Man With A Cross On His Back



Wednesday, June 18, 2014

Calling All Jehovah Name Witnesses

Wanted:

JEHOVAH FREE CHURCHES

JESUS NAME ONLY CHURCHES
_________________

DID YOU EVER WONDER? DID IT EVER COME INTO YOUR MIND?

That those who praise the Jehovah name as the name of God Almighty, have NEVER DONE ANY MIRACLE AT ALL USING, INVOKING, CALLING UPON THAT NAME?

If the name Jehovah is so all powerful, is who Jesus is: how come this name is used, invoked, called upon; in witchcraft rituals, in Freemason rituals, in meetings of satanist, and Jesus name is never used, invoked, or called upon at the same time? How come these cults will not allow the name of Jesus to be spoken during their rituals?

DID YOU EVER WONDER? DID IT EVER COME INTO YOUR MIND?

That there may be many more cult people within our churches than we thought or dreamed? And it is these influences that deceive so many that Jehovah is the true name of God the Father?

What will it take to wake people up? Can they be woke up? Will they use some common sense and study to see if it is true that a mystic-satanic monk invented the name of Jehovah?

Why is it that more people are excited about going to Church to dance and shout and few are going to Church to lift up the name of Jesus above all names? That in many cases the name of Jehovah is worshiped and praised more than the name of Jesus?

I know many are dull of hearing and reading about me going on and on about this, but why shout and dance and sing to the Jehovah name when IF YOU GET TO HEAVEN you will NEVER SPEAK THE JEHOVAH NAME BECAUSE IT NEVER WAS THE NAME OF GOD?

All caps is not screaming here, it is emphasis.

I have had lots of men and women pass by me this year who were at first excited about the name of Jesus being above Jehovah and Yahweh and YHWH: but then as they went over to satanic controlled FB groups: they soon fell away not able to stand up for the name of Jesus. And today they are my enemies. This shows me, people are not true blue to the name of Jesus Christ.

Okay, if the name Jehovah (LORD all in caps KJV) is so all powerful name of God the Father and Jesus is the all powerful name of God the Son: can anyone please forward to me any miracle worker's name who uses Jehovah or LORD to obtain miracles? Can any of you produce any pastor who is doing miracles, evangelist, prophet, apostle, teacher: who is using the name Jehovah to cast out demons?

Just asking........

Have any of you cast out a demon using the name Jehovah or LORD?
Have any of you called on Jehovah or LORD and gotten a miracle?

Just asking........

I already know I cannot wake up the dead, especially those waiting to hear the Jehovah name of LORD: because I will leave them dead; I am not calling upon the name of Jehovah or LORD ever over them.

I will just leave them dead.

Just saying.....
Just saying.....

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

Jehovah Name Invented For Cult Purposes

Needed, one million tracts to spread the discovery that an occult monk invented the name Jehovah for cult purposes.

Raymundus Martini was a Jewish mystic who allegedly converted to the Catholic church and became a monk.

He was deep into satanic mysticism of the kabbalah. In his search for the pronunciation of YHVH, the tetragrammaton: he invented the name Jehovah. This name was to be used by those in the secret order with whom he was a leader and member.

We did not know this for centuries. But many did. Many religious leaders knew. Many of our Oneness Pentecostal pastors and leaders knew. But they were members of the Freemasons who held the name Jehova was the lost name of God. These Freemasons infiltrated the Pentecostal ranks and impregnated it with Jehovah teachings.

One such famous Pentecostal Freemason was Charles Pharham. He never gave up his membership in the lodge. You can Google him and find pictures of him, of his Masonic gavel, and some of his other Masonic pictures. How come we are not told this in our study of Stone's Folly and the Topeka, Kansas Pentecostal revival?

How come Charles Pharham went to Azuza Street and condemned what was taking place there and mocked it?

Did you know in his day, Blacks were not allowed in White Freemason lodges? Did you know the most of racism within Oneness ranks came from secret White Freemason Pentecostal leaders?

Did you know these are the ones who wrote the most about Jehovah being the name of God? Did you know they impregnated all of Pentecostalism with this invented Jehovah name?

Did you know that Charles Taze Russell, founder of the Jehovah's Witnesses, stole the name Jehovah from the Masonic lodge and built a religion out of it. Did you know he was a high-ranking Freemason? Did you Google him and see his Masonic tombstone? Did you ever take a look at the tombstone of William Branham? How does his compare to that of Russell? Did you know Branham said it was ok to be a Freemason? Many claim he was a Freemason. Was he? He certainly was a Jehovah name preacher.

We have had four generations of Jehovah preachers infusing that name in our worship, in our literature, and in our bibles. It is time for Jehovah free churches.

Are you bold enough?
Are you brave enough?

You say you want proof? Well go Google and search for it. Search for the Truth if you want it. When people ask me for proof and I give it, they call me a liar. So I quit trying to prove much to these kinds of people. I tell them go prove it yourself.

If you love the name of Jesus, the name above all names: you will remove the monk invented name Jehovah from your worship. You will blot it out of your bibles. And you will teach the name of Jesus as the name of God Almighty.

Viva Jesus

Bishop Reckart
A True Jesus Only

Sunday, June 15, 2014

HAPPY FATHER'S DAY JESUS

MY FATHER'S DAY CARD
TO FATHER GOD JESUS
           _________

Father God Jesus: every day is Father's Day with you. If I had to pick my God in a line-up of all other gods, I would still choose you to be my Father God.

As I think of all that a Father is: you Jesus God excel all of them.

From the very start Father God Jesus, I want to be your son. I want to be your child. I want to be an honor to your name. You gave me an honorable name and I want to keep it honorable.

Father God Jesus: help me to more and more lift up your name above all names. Give me wisdom, knowledge, understanding, wit, and a mind to write great things for your glory. Open the eyes of people and let them see the Truth. So many are being blinded by the darkness they have chosen. If they can be brought out, Jesus help me to bring them out and show them the Light.

Father God Jesus, complete in all of us your perfection to the fullness of your holiness. Let us fall in love with all that you are as God.

Your son of the Blood

Friday, June 13, 2014

I Am Calling You Out

This is not a game. YHWH cult members have made vows to destroy the name of Jesus from the earth. Each and every day they deceive souls to recant, deny, and curse the name of Jesus. You may think you are not responsible to do anything. But you are. If you do not defend and stand up for the name of Jesus, you do not deserve another blessing using that name. I call you out from among the YHWH cults. Do not be friends with those who are destroying the name of Jesus from the earth.

YHWH Is A Gentile Pagan Name, It Is The Name Of Baal. Jehovah and Yahweh Invented From YHWH Are Therefore Names of The Baal god.

When anyone calls Babylonian Aramaic the Hebrew language they tell lies. When someone says YHWH is a Hebrew name they tell lies. YHWH in the Aramaic alphabet is not Hebrew therefore it is not a Hebrew name. Where did it come from since no one knew the name of this god except the Baal religion? This YHWH is found on the Moabite Stone. It is written in Canaanite or Phoenician, which is called Paleo-Hebrew. On this stone YHWH is the god of Israel. Israel here is the north ten tribes. King Mesha of Moab conquered Mt. Nebo which was part of the tribes of the north ten tribes. All of the north ten tribes were worshipers of Baal (YHWH). This is why when King Moab conquered Mt. Nebo he claims he captured the altar of YHWH. But he did not conquer Jerusalem of the tribes of Judah or Benjamin. So he did not capture an altar of the true God in Jerusalem. He captured the altar of the false god Baal of the north ten tribes. This Baal god is on the Mesha Stone as YHWH. This stone proves that Baal and YHWH are the same god.

Anyone who claims YHWH is the true God is telling lies. It does not matter if these liars are rabbis, priests, Pharisees, philosophers, mystics, monks, popes, reformers, preachers, scholars, or idiots.

We are told in Acts 4:12 there was NO NAME GIVEN under heaven among men greater than the name of Jesus Christ. This is our doctrine. No Other Name.

If you believe Jehovah or Yahweh are greater names than Jesus you are wrong. Anyone who teaches this is wrong. Everyone who is faithful and true will admit that YHWH is the name of Baal god. They will admit Jehovah and Yahweh invented by monks from YHWH are nothing but guess names for Baal god. They must admit that the bible calls all false gods devils. Therefore, everyone must understand why we say Jehovah and Yahweh are devil names of the false god Baal. God bless you....
_______________

Please remember I do not speak Spanish. Please remember I use Google Translate of Bing Translate. The words may not come through correctly. But you can understand.

Thursday, June 12, 2014

WHAT I HAVE SAID - I AM 100% RIGHT

What I have said:

There is no such thing as a Hebrew language.
I have proved that what is called the Hebrew language is in fact two Gentile languages. The first is Phoenician which is called Paleo-Hebrew. The second is Babylonian Aramaic which is falsely called Biblical Hebrew. I have proved that neither of these were the language of Adam, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, or Moses. While I am called an anti-semite because I say there is no such thing as a Hebrew language, no one has ever proved me wrong. And no one ever will. Paleo-Hebrew came into existence about 1200-1000BC. That does not even go back to the flood. Babylonian Aramaic also only goes back to this same time period. Adam did not speak this Aramaic they call Biblical Hebrew. And although Strong's Exhaustive Concordance is held by many to be ordained and inspired by God: the Old Testament Aramaic (Chaldean) words are in fact from profane Gentiles. It is one big hoax, a big fat lie, to call this Biblical Hebrew and pass it off as the language God gave to Adam.

I have proved that in the days of Jesus there existed three bibles. The oldest was a copy of the Paleo-Hebrew that was allegedly kept in the temple in Jerusalem. Allegedly this was the bench mark bible all translations had to match. This bible was apparently destroyed in 70AD when the temple was burned by Titus. No one has seen this bible or any part of it. God did not preserve it. God did not preserve one jot or one tittle.

I have proved that the rabbis around 300BC, by their own testimony, translated the Paleo-Hebrew bible into Babylonian Aramaic. There are so many scholars who accept this date there is no reason for me to argue against it. This Babylonian Aramaic bible was in the Gentle language of Babylon. Why was it translated into this Gentile language? The reason is, most Jews at that time no longer could read or understand the older Paleo-Hebrew. When the Jews were carried away to Babylon around 606BC, they slowly began to speak the Aramaic language. And after raising their children in this Gentile kingdom for two and three generations (100 years), they could not speak this tongue any longer. All they could speak was the Babylonian Aramaic. So around 300BC the majority spoke Aramaic and so a bible was made for them. The only problem here with this Aramaic bible, was the rabbis interpolated into it YHWH in over 6,000 places. This YHWH god (Yaaveh/Yaaweh) was the chief god of the Babylonia Assyrian pantheon. The rabbis equated this chief god with their God and made them one. This is why in the Aramaic bible YHWH became the god of the Jews. This god was not known by Adam, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Moses, or even king David. This tetragrammaton (four letters) was replaced by LORD all in caps in the King James Version. This is one of the biggest hoaxes in all humanity. This god YHWH is not the God referred to by Jesus as Father. The Aramaic bible also was kept in the temple in Jerusalem. The only bible used in the synagigues and in the temple in Jerusalem, was the Greek Septuagint. Since 280BC the Jews loved this bible. Most Jews at that time after being conquered by Alexander the great, spoke Greek and named their children by Greek names. This explains why so many Jews had Greek names from 330BC on to the day of Jesus. In 70AD the last copy of the Babylonian Aramaic was taken to Rome by Titus and there it was destroyed or lost. No one has seen it since the time of the parade of triumph of Titus in Rome. Did God purposely allow this Babylonian bible to be lost? How come God did not preserve it? Attempts to reconstruct this Aramaic bible was ongoing among rabbis until around 800AD rabbi Ben Ezra we are told was successful via the Masoretic scribes to reconstruct an Aramaic bible. How we are not told, only that they did.  

Once reconstructed they then added vowel points to try and recover how this language was once spoken in the days of Jesus. This was all a guess. The vowel points have been a great confusion and many consider them mostly false. The modern Masoretic bible called the Biblical Hebrew Bible was not translated from the original Paleo-Hebrew. And it was not translated from the Babylonian Aramaic of 300BC or that in the Temple in 70AD. What we have is an invented rabbi bible. The question comes up, why did God lose every jot and every tittle of both the Paleo-Hebrew and Babylonian Bibles? Someone has to answer this. Maybe you will ignore or avoid this question because it cuts hard across the rabbi fables we have been told about the bible. And it cast great doubt and suspicion on the Old Testament we now have in the King James Version, taken from this rabbi invented bible.

I have proved that Greek is Paleo-Hebrew written in reverse. That the sound of the Paleo-Hebrew letters are preserved in Greek. I have proved that to take the letter symbol sounds of Babylonian Aramaic and place these upon Paleo-Hebrew is not only a fraud, it is a massive hoax spread by over 12 centuries of bible translators. The most massive hoax is found in the King James Version translator notes: "Newly Translated out of the Original | tongues: & with the former Translations | diligently compared and revised."  This is false. The Old Testament was not translated out of the original Paleo-Hebrew because it no longer existed. And it was not translated out of the original Babylonian Aramaic existing in the days of Jesus, it no longer existed. The Old Testament was translated out of the rabbi Ben Ezra invented Masotetic text. While many have heard of the Masoretic rabbis who allegedly were working in Israel to make another Jewish bible, they have never been told who these Masoretic rabbis were. They were Babylonian trained rabbis who hated Jesus Christ and the Christian Church. Why should we go back to rabbis for an invented bible when we can go back and get the Greek bible Jesus and the Apostles used  and was used in all of the synagogues?

I have proved from several sources that Jesus did not use or accept the Babylonian Aramaic bible. I have proved and most scholars agree, that Jesus used the Greek Septuagint translated bible. This Greek language bible was translated from Paleo-Hebrew around 280BC by special miracles of God and by men who knew Paleo-Hebrew and Greek perfectly. This is the bible Jesus used and quoted from in the New Testament. Immediately we see a conflict in our King James Version bible, because the Old Testament is translated from the rabbi Masoretic invented Aramaic bible. And the New Testament in Greek quotes Jesus and the Apostles using the Greek Bible. When you compare New Testament quotes of Old Testament scriptures they do not match what is in the Old Testament that came from Aramaic. This shows us there is a contradiction between the Aramaic invented text and the New Testament received Greek text. As Christians we accept the Greek New Testament OVER THE ARAMAIC OLD TESTAMENT. What bible did Jesus use? I have proved from the quotes of scholars that Jesus used the Greek Septuagint. I have also proved that the King James translators in their notes admit Jesus and the Apostles used the Greek text. If Jesus never called the Babylonian Aramaic bible "scripture" why should we? What he called "scripture" was the Greek bible. So should we.

I have proved by use of scholars that YHWH is four letters that did not exist in the Paleo-Hebrew or Babylonian Aramaic bible. There are different symbols used to replace these four Latin letters. When someone says ancient Hebrew had no letter J symbol, well they did not have YHWH letter symbols either. I have proved that YHWH are letters used in all the black satanic arts of mysticism and witchcraft. Anyone can research this. YHWH comes with the HEX, the six-pointed star that has nothing to do with king David. It is called the seal of Solomon and is also tied to satanism, witchcraft, and mysticism. YWHW and the HEX go together. I have proved that the name of Jesus does not in any way descend from or contain YHWH. I have proved the name of Jesus cannot be a Babylonian Aramaic name or he had a Gentile name. Any name in Aramaic is not a Hebrew name. Those who claim Jesus had to have a Hebrew name and then use the Gentile Babylonian Aramaic language to get it, are spreading a big hoax. This makes Yahshua and Yahshuah both false names.

I have proved that both Jehovah and Yahweh, were invented by Catholic monks deep into mysticism and witchcraft. I have proved no one knew the name Jehovah before 1260-1280AD. It was not in any bible before that time. It was not known by Jesus or the Apostles. It is not found one time in the New Testament. It is missing in heaven in the book of Revelation. It is an impossibility for it to exist the seven (7) times it is found in the present King James Version Masoretic Aramaic text. There is no way Abraham, Moses, David, or Isaiah knew this name because it did not exist in their times. I have proved that Jehovah and Yahweh are both invented devil names God had nothing to do with. God does not work through satanic cults to reveal his name.

This cuts hard across those who scream they are the true Jehovah's Witnesses (Stoneking and company). It cuts hard across all those cookie cutter bible school graduates of the UPC, PAW, PAJC, ALJC, et al: when they claim Jesus is Jehovah come in the flesh. I have given scripture that shows we must confess Jesus Christ has come in the flesh and anyone who does not confess this is anti-christ (2John 1:7). How dare we use the monk invented names Jehovah and Yahweh and tie Jesus to these names and gods that did not exist in his day?

For sure, Jesus is the Old Testament God manifested in the flesh, but this God NEVER had a name called Jehovah or Yahweh. Cookie cutter bible school graduates who espouse and preach Roman Catholic names for God must fall on their knees and repent and rise to preach the name of Jesus Christ ABOVE ALL NAMES. They must be "solo Jesus Christ" and no more YHWH, Jehovah, Yahweh, or Yahshua.

I have proved that many modern Oneness Pentecostals are still so wrapped up in Catholic traditions they are correctly Pentecostal Catholics. They hate being called this, but what else are they when they practice Catholic inventions like Christmas, New Year's Eve, St. Valentine's Day, St. Patrick's Day, Easter, and scream halleluyah to Jehovah and Yahweh? How can any Oneness Pentecostal who celebrates these with Rome say they are not Pentecostal Catholics? It hurts their feelings to admit they are Pentecostal Catholics. Rather then admit they are, they retaliate with hate, anger, blasphemy, lies, slander, and use any method of reproach known to man to attack me. What is the purpose of this? The purpose is to keep people in Pentecostal Catholicism. It is to keep people in their religious organization. It is to keep people in their mega churches and tell them these pagan practices are not pagan any more because the General Superintendent says they aren't. So, people accept the opinion of a Pentecostal Oneness little pope over the Word of God. I am right on this and anyone who believes the truth will know I am right.

There are many other things I am 100% right on. I know I have lots of enemies. My hate mail is rather larger. I would say presently I have over 500 enemies on Facebook. But will I cave in? No, because I am right.

It is my motive and goal, my purpose in life: to prove the name of Jesus Christ is the name of God. The name of the Father is Jesus (prove that false). The name of the Son is Jesus (prove that false). And the name of the Holy Ghost is Jesus (prove that false).

And that there is no name EVER given under heaven above the name of Jesus Christ (prove this false).

I have openly debated and defended the name of Jesus Christ since 1993 and I have never lost a debate. If you want to debate me "IN PERSON IN FRONT OF YOUR CHURCH" and deny the name of Jesus is above all names, I will come there. If you are not a Pastor do not even bother. I only debate men who have shown they can pastor a church.

Jesus Christ is the name above all names.

Bishop Reckart
A Man God Made

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Re-Baptisms

54 souls rebaptized in the Philippines. I rebaptized only this minister and his wife. The other 52 were baptized by godly Pastors.

Why did they want rebaptism?

Several ministers had come from the same church and the pastor was now backslid. He backslid after being caught committing adultery. He had been committing adultery at the time he baptized them.

Many of them had been baptized in the trinity.

Many of them had backslidden and went back to all manner of sin and evil. They came back during my revival and wanted their faith secure and requested rebaptism.

In none of these 54 rebaptisms were they told by me they "had" to be rebaptized. And in zero cases of the whole 54 did I require any of them to be baptized by me. I baptized the minister and his wife upon the wife's request who had been backslidden many years and was now coming back to the Lord.

The subject of being rebaptized comes up all the time. I have openly dealt with this subject because I believe it is salvational.

I have been accused of claiming that unless I am the one who rebaptizes people, they are not baptized properly. Or they lie and claim I preach I must rebaptize everyone. Neither of these are true.

Water baptism according to Acts 2:38 must follow not only an exact and precise formula, it must be performed and practiced according to precise and exact New Testament doctrine.

Water baptism is wrong when it is administered before a person repents. If a person has not fully repented of all sins, and not just the ones they consider sin: they are not a qualified candidate for New Testament baptism according to Acts 2:38.

Many people are rushed to the water and baptized and they do not receive remission of sins because they have never repented or they have never repented of all their sins. No sin can be excluded from baptism. Any sin that is not repented disqualifies the candidate.

For instance:

A man comes to church and feels condemned and under conviction for his sinful life. He goes forward to the altar and cries out to God. He weeps and trembles as the Holy Spirit moves upon him. Someone comes to him and whispers in his ear he needs to rise and be baptized. He gets up and is led to the baptismal room. There he puts on a white robe and waits for the pastor to call him down into the water. He proceeds into the water. The pastor stands on the outside of the tank waiting as music is playing in the background. As the man turns toward the pastor: the pastor baptizes him in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost which is Lord Jesus Christ. The man comes up praising God. He leaves and gets dressed. The pastor announces another soul has been baptized. But there is a problem here. The man is committing adultery with Betty a backslid church member and wife of another man. He did not repent for his adultery. He did not plan to forsake his adultery. He was in fact going to continue to live in adultery. Was his baptism valid? I say it was not. And I also say the pastor was out of order to baptize a man who had not fully repented and made a choice to live a holy and godly life after his baptism.

Here is another case, real life case.

A pastor is committing adultery on his wife for over 12 years with different women in the church. Over these 12 years he baptized many people. Was he qualified to baptize? Many of the members came to me about this. I told them, in my opinion they should be rebaptized. They asked me who will rebaptize them since no one in their group believes in rebaptism. I agreed to rebaptize some of them. I then informed them to tell those others they knew to find a godly pastor and have him rebaptize them. By the way, this was a UPC pastor but there are other adulterous pastors and preachers in different groups who are baptizing people and they are living in sin. They are not qualified New Testament baptizers.

There are many cases in which I believe a person should be rebaptized.

I do not accept baptisms by a woman. All baptized by a woman must be rebaptized by a qualified Man of God.

I do not accept baptisms by any law-keepers.

I do not accept any baptisms by the followers of William Branham.

I do not accept any baptisms by trinitarians.

I do not accept any baptisms by an adulterous pastor or preacher,

I do not accept any baptisms by false prophets, even if they are Oneness, Acts 2:38.

I do not accept any baptisms by any Preterist who claims the rapture took place in 70AD.

I do not accept any baptisms in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost said to be Lord Jesus Christ.

I do not accept any baptisms by novices who have not been properly trained and ordained.

I do not accept any baptisms by YHWH groups.

I do not accept any baptism performed by a homosexual pastor or preacher.

I do not accept any baptisms by those who exalt YHWH above the name of Jesus Christ.

I do not claim I am the only person who can rebaptize. If there is a Man of God who is properly ordained, and who is living a holy and Godly life, I will accept his baptisms.

Do I believe in rebaptisms? Yes I do, because many of the baptisms being performed are not biblical baptisms.

What about One Lord, One Faith, and One Baptism? Don't that mean a person can only be baptized one time? No, and anyone who teaches or says this is a lying false teacher. This "One Baptism" has nothing to do with the number of times a person can be baptized, it has all to do with the fact there is only ONE BAPTISMAL FORMULA. Anyone who teaches otherwise is a false prophet. A false prophet cannot prophesy a person has remission of sins and they have never received the ONE BAPTISMAL FORMULA.

If you are in need of rebaptism, seek out a qualified and ordained Man of God and go back to the water. Obtain your gift of grace in the remission of your sins. Then rise in the waters of resurrection to live a holy and godly life.

Jesus bless you all,


Bishop Reckart
A Man God Made

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

BEWARE THE MARK OF THE BEAST

YHWH is the name of the god of the New World order. 

According to the rabbis, when their messiah comes he will use this YHWH as the name of his god and he will teach them how to pronounce it, This coming messiah we know is the antichrist. 

Therefore YHWH will be the name of the god of the anti-christ. 

YHWH is the name of the Baphomet god of the Freemasons. 

YHWH is the god of the Illuminati. 

YHWH is the god of the occults. 

The origin of YHWH god is Assyria when the rabbis accepted it and put it into the Aramaic translation. The letters you see on this sticky doorpost card is Aramaic which today is falsely called Hebrew. You can see this sticky mark of the beast. 

The mark of the beast will be these four letter which are the name of his god. Beware you are not deceived to accept these letters YHWH from people who are change agents for the antichrist system. Beware. 

If you want to post this mark of the beast YHWH that is your choice. But for me, JESUS is the name above all names.

Can You Save Yourself?

Acts 2:40---And with many other words did he testify and exhort, saying, save yourselves from this untoward generation.

Can you be talked out of holiness? That is the real target of my bible study today.

We all know that if Jesus died for all, then all were lost. We also all know that without the shedding of the blood of Jesus Christ, there is no salvation for anyone, Jew or Gentile. All of our hope and faith in salvation is in the sacrifice of Jesus upon the Cross.

This sacrifice of flesh and blood (The Passover Emblems), is our atonement. It is the blood of the body of Jesus that washes away our sins at the time of water baptism. And it is the blood applied at the moment of baptism that changes us from an ungodly sinner to a holy person with sins forgiven and totally remitted to never be remembered against us again. We know then that our sins separate between us and God. And when these are removed, our separated status changes and we come into the unity of Christ. At the moment of this unity, the Holy Ghost comes into the human temple and we begin to speak in other tongues as the Spirit gives the utterance. We are now sanctified by the blood and the water and the Spirit.

After we are saved then what? This is the pivotal question many will face. Are you once saved always saved? Is the initial salvation of Christ the only spiritual experience of the mind, body, and soul? If you are not once saved always saved, are there any sins that can separate you from Christ? How does living holy after the blood cleansing of water baptism affect your salvation? Can a person be lost if they reject the holiness given to them at the moment of their new birth? Is holiness also eternally imputed in the once saved always saved golden package? And if you are counted holy forever as the once saved always saved groups teach, then it is true nothing you do can cause you to be lost or fall from grace. Here is where modern Pentecostalism stands today. They stand at the crossroads of eternal security and faith. If you turn left onto the eternal security highway you never need any faith because you are eternally secure because you accepted Christ as your personal Savior. So there is no free-moral exercise of faith on this highway of predestination. But, is there a living faith after salvation? If you continue straight on the highway of faith what will you discover?

A few years back in South Africa a nice young couple with a daughter were progressing nicely in the Apostolic doctrine. They were learning and growing. But a liberal charismatic pastor turned them away from holiness that I was putting into them. It was not long, he also turned them into my enemies. They departed from all holiness and went back to the life of a liberal charismatic. What tool of deception did this pastor work on their mind? It is a simple tool of deception. The devil has used it now for quite a few years. It goes like this:

Only Jesus can save you right?
You cannot save yourself right?
Then you must trust in Jesus alone, by faith alone, and by grace alone, right?
If your salvation is not by your own works, how can works after salvation save you, right?
If you try to do anything after salvation to be saved, you are trying to be saved by your own works, right?
The scripture says: not of works lest any man should boast, right?
Not of works means in getting saved, right?
Not of works means after salvation, right?
Okay, you have now agreed that performance religion is unscriptural, right?
Now, accept the fact that holiness standards are man trying to please God and Calvary is Jesus pleasing God the Father for our salvation. Do you accept this?
Now, can you do anything greater than what Jesus did on Calvary?
If Jesus saved you, how can you save yourself by performance religion that holds a standard of holiness?

At this point the victim is rendered totally hopeless. If they deny Jesus alone saved them, they consider themselves a very evil sinner. If they believe there is faith works after salvation, they consider themselves trying to save themselves by their performance. If they accept the once saved always saved, once holy always holy, doctrine: then nothing they do, no sin they commit, after accepting Jesus as their personal Savior can cause them to be lost. They conclude then, that they have no obligations after salvation to live holy or to be a moral person. They can sin for all their worth and never be lost. And they can dress any way they want and it will not be held against them.

This couple in South Africa chose to accept the doctrine of this charismatic pastor and they departed from me. The last pictures I saw of the wife she had on pants, wearing earrings and makeup. Their little girl had on pants and earrings. The husband was wearing shorts and his face was painted up with paint stripes like he was supporting some sports team. They were among a very ungodly looking charismatic church group. I was so sad to see this. But, after these many years I have seen many turn aside into vain jangling. This is why I say:

If a person CAN be deceived, they will be deceived.

After salvation are there any requirements Christians must comply with to stay saved? Notice I did not say to get saved. But let me deal with that also right here.

True Jesus died for all on Calvary. But does this automatically give everyone blanket salvation? Must a person hear and believe the Gospel? If so, is this not an act of the person to accept the blood shed atonement on Calvary? And if a person must accept this and believe it, is this not works? A person had to do something. And doing something is works, right? Is accepting doing something? Is believing doing something? And if it is, although it is an exercise of the mind, is it not true this is evidence a person must do something to be saved?

Can a person be saved who refuses to repent? Isn't repentance something a person does? Isn't what a person does works? What makes all these works acceptable to God? It is the faith behind believing and accepting that produces the work of repentance. It is the faith behind them that is what produces repentance. And this faith is given to us by the goodness of God. Without the goodness of faith we can do nothing. And believe me, faith is the blessing of the goodness of God. Not all people have this goodness of faith. Look at this verse:

Romans 2:4---Or despiseth thou the riches of his goodness and forbearance and longsuffering, not knowing that the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance?

Although Calvary is complete. The finished work of redemption is over. No man can add to it or take from it. Yet everyone must do something to receive it. To do anything is performance or works. If you do not do these things the finished work of Calvary will profit a person nothing. They can die in their sins. Therefore, we conclude that there is a required performance of faith works by every individual or they will be lost.

Please differentiate between New Testament faith works and Old Testament Law works. There is nothing in this Bible Study about performance of Law works. Any verse of scripture in context of Law works cannot be used against faith works of the New Testament that have no connection to the Law.

A person must accept the following verses:

REV 20:12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.

REV 20:13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.

These verses do not say a person is saved by faith only (see James 2:17-26).

This shows us that works, both good and evil will be judged. It shows us faith without works is dead.

How can anyone say that repentance is not faith and not good works?
How can anyone say being baptized in the name of Jesus Christ is not faith and not good works?
How can anyone say being filled with the Holy Ghost is not by faith and something that happens by the works of prayer and praise?

These are the first works. Let us now look at this verse:

REV 2:5 Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place, except thou repent.

This whole church congregation was commanded by Jesus himself to repent. They did not have the blanket once saved always saved, once holy always holy golden ticket. Jesus said this church needed to repent. This is something they must do. If they obey this is faith works. If they do their first works, this is their faith works. And if they refuse, he said he would remove the candlestick from among that church. Many churches are dark inside with their liberalism and they refuse to repent and do the first faith works as found in Acts 2:38.

Is obedience a work, a performance? Yes. Faithful students look up each of the following verses and get the intent of works. Prove to yourself if you do not measure up after salvation and change your behavior and your life, you will be lost. Get a revelation how faith saves you and keeps you saved by the obedience of faith. Learn that the words "performance and works" are not evil and they are not bad. And neither of them take anything away from the salvation work of Jesus on the Cross.

Romans 2:8;
Romans 6:16;
Romans 15:18;
Romans 16:19;
Romans 16:26;
Galatians 3:1;
Galatians 5:7;
2Corinthians 2:9;
2Corinthians 10:5;
2Thessalonians 1:8;
Hebrew 5:9;
1Peter 1:14;
1Peter 4:17

Ok, you have finished reading these verses. What did you learn. Did you learn you had a once saved, once holy golden ticket and you can do anything you want and still be saved? Or did you learn there is faith after faith salvation that you must personally perform and work out? How about this verse:

PHI 2:12 Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.

Paul said nothing here about any golden ticket straight to heaven by faith only in the finished work of Calvary for salvation.

Now, back to holiness.

Is holiness something God does or is it something we do.

Both.

When you receive full and complete remission of sins at the time of water baptism, you are washed by the waters of regeneration (1Tim 3:5). You are cleansed totally. There is no sin in you any more to condemn you (Rom 8:1). You are made holy by the blood of Jesus. This is where your holiness begins. And this is the holiness you are to keep with you the rest of your life.

If you are baptized unholy, and dressed unholy, you need to go back. Only the ungodly bury people in partial nakedness. Most who are buried are buried in clothing which they like and hope to be resurrected in. The same in water baptism. Many preachers do not care they will baptize you any way you are. This is false. A woman should be dressed in her first holiness. A man likewise. You are coming up out of the water to live a resurrected life. See that you go down and come up proper.

Since holiness begins at the time of water baptism, it is the responsibility of the baptizer to make sure the candidate is properly prepared. Do not expect the sinful nature to be washed away and you put them down in shorts and halter tops and bring them up that way. This is a snare upon the soul and many of these eventually go back to this life style. We want holiness to prevail from the moment of repentance until this soul is safe on the other side waiting for the resurrection, or safe and rapture ready.

Holiness is performance and it is works. But in saying this, we admit it is faith performance and faith works, because without this faith behind our holiness we do not believe that how a person dresses will save them. You can dress up a sinner in holiness clothing but it will not save them. In fact many people going to church dress up and they are not saved. But a person who is saved who dresses in holiness, they exemplify the very nature of Jesus Christ. And no one can prove Jesus Christ went about Israel in ungodly and worldly garments that rendered him partial naked. Jesus despised the nakedness the priest and temple cult forced upon him on the Cross. It was shameful and he hated it.

HEB 12:2 Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God.

If Jesus despised the shame of his own nakedness upon the Cross, why would he love your nakedness? Your nakedness was a shame from Genesis 3:10.

Holiness is a nature of God. He said: "be ye holy for I am holy" (1Peter 1:16).

Is there any image of God in heaven or Jesus upon the earth where they were dressed in any unholy manner? If God has on garments is this performance and works? Why do we allow men to invent these catchy words and then pervert them to mean holiness is evil because it is performance and works just as God himself presents it?

Can someone talk you out of holiness with catchy words and false interpretations of the Word of God?

Can someone actually prove to you that God no longer accepts holiness as a part of the Christian life after salvation?

Can you be so ignorant, or so caught up in the lusts of the flesh, desiring and wanting worldliness so bad: you will pervert the Word of God?

If you can be deceived that after initial salvation you are not responsible to save yourself from falling: then you will become a victim of a lying spirit. What else will these lying spirits convince you is not acceptable to God? After all, once faith performance and faith works are no longer a love within your heart, will not the love of the world enter in? And if the love of the world enters in, will you not begin a lot of sinful performances and works?

You can keep yourself saved after initial salvation and Jesus will show you how. If you have a good Pastor he will not only teach you, he will do his best to present you faultless before the throne of Jesus. If you have a bad pastor, he will allow you all the liberty you desire to live any ungodly way you want. And he will brainwash you into believing you have the golden ticket and nothing you can do will save you or keep you saved.

I say as did Peter on the day of Pentecost:

"Acts 2:40b---saying, save yourselves from this untoward generation.

Bishop Reckart
Keep yourself saved after Jesus saves you

Monday, June 9, 2014

Jude 1:10-16

Jude 1:10-16--these are the days.

I will remain strong in faith and in the Word.

Bishop Reckart
A Man God Made

Sunday, June 8, 2014

The Day Of Pentecost, The Day The Church Was Born

The Church is my mother.
I was born through the Church.
My birth water was my water baptism.
I was born of the Spirit there.

I know many do not have proper spiritual knowledge because they have been taught the church is only the place to go and hoop it up or reach out for a new blessing. If there are sinners present they are invited to jump and dance and join in although they are not Spirit filled or saved yet.

Today is the day of Pentecost. I thank Jesus he gave me a revelation of this day. He did not give this revelation to many. Because they were not faithful in that which was least. And besides, they have been leaning to their own understanding for so long, Truth does not have a precedent over their carnal mind. But I surrendered. I humbled down. And the Spirit spoke unto me: "WRITE." And since that day, I have written Bible studies as I have been inspired. And I am doing my best to wake up those asleep in Zion.

Today, is the day of Pentecost. A day chosen by God for a special miracle of salvation unleashed upon the world if they will but receive it.

It takes Men of God to carry this forward from generation to generation, walking in the Light as he is the Light. Men dedicated not to understanding but to Truth. And therein is the battle today. Men pushing their understanding and it is not the Truth.

On the day of Pentecost, Peter standing with the eleven, began to preach the Truth. Truth does not depend upon understanding, it depends upon revelation. God cannot send a lie to be revealed Truth. Yes, I know this is pretty strong meat for novices, just go sit down somewhere and submit. Revelation comes in maturity and if you novices refuse to submit till you mature: you will end up in a ditch. If anyone rejects today as the annual day of Pentecost, it is proof he has not submitted.

The day of Pentecost has come. I have a vision to restore this Church in all nations. First among a few souls, then to many more as the doors swing open. While I have very few supporting me in prayer and join my missionary spirit, I continue to run my own race and press toward the crown before me. Yes, I do intend to receive a crown and I promise everyone: I will not let you take it from me with hate and disrespect (Revelation 3:11).

I began my race the day I received the Holy Ghost back in 1968. I have not quit. I have NEVER backslid. I have not compromised. Holiness is still the center of my life and preaching. I have shown love to many in many nations. I have established the plan of salvation among thousands. My internet Bible studies reach over half a million souls each year. All because I had my personal day of Pentecost.

We here at Jesus House will take a spiritual journey back to the true Mother Church. We will again declare our love for being born into the Body of Christ. As a son of God and as a friend to many, may I suggest you get a revelation and no longer lean to your own understanding. Your understanding could be wrong and this can lead you to be lost. People can mess with your understanding and change your mind, but when you have the Truth, there is no changing, none is needed.

Happy Day of Pentecost, and may Jesus bless you over and over as you praise him for your birth in the Mother Church.

Bishop Reckart
Born Again Just Like The Bible Says