Jesus absolutely DID NOT use the Aramaic Babylonian bible translated by rabbis from Paleo Hebrew around 300BC.
These Babylonian rabbis, whose names we do not know, made many thousands of changes in the Word of God.
They added, changed, reworded, many hundreds of scriptures.
The quotes of the original Paleo Hebrew found in the New Testament exposes the Aramaic Babylonian bible in the places where fraud occurred. Because the NT writers did not quote more, we do not know all of the text that were perverted.
We do know, these Babylonian rabbis added YHWH in many thousands of places where it could not possibly have existed.
If you use Strongs to interpret all OT words, you could be led to accept Babylonian Aramaic words that are false.
Be careful using Strongs for the Old Testament.
For the New Testament we can check him with other Greek scholars. But we have no way to check Aramaic against the Paleo-Hebrew because the rabbis have destroyed all copies of that original bible.
Jesus did not use the Aramaic Babylonian bible translation. Why should we?
Bishop Reckart
A Man God Made
They added, changed, reworded, many hundreds of scriptures.
The quotes of the original Paleo Hebrew found in the New Testament exposes the Aramaic Babylonian bible in the places where fraud occurred. Because the NT writers did not quote more, we do not know all of the text that were perverted.
We do know, these Babylonian rabbis added YHWH in many thousands of places where it could not possibly have existed.
If you use Strongs to interpret all OT words, you could be led to accept Babylonian Aramaic words that are false.
Be careful using Strongs for the Old Testament.
For the New Testament we can check him with other Greek scholars. But we have no way to check Aramaic against the Paleo-Hebrew because the rabbis have destroyed all copies of that original bible.
Jesus did not use the Aramaic Babylonian bible translation. Why should we?
Bishop Reckart
A Man God Made
Strongs alleged Hebrew is based upon Chaldee. Read the front of his book. Chaldee is Aramaic. Aramaic is Babylon.
ReplyDeleteThe Jews did not have or use Aramaic until God sent them to Babylon for idolatry and cast them out of his land.
They adopted Aramaic and thew away their original Paleo-Hebrew. The alphabet was finally thrown away between 100-200AD. So was Aramaic.
The Jews recreated the Aramaic bible about 800-1000BC.
Strong based his dictionary of the Old Testament on that new invented Aramaic bible. Many think this is the holy bible of the Old Testament. This is one of the biggest lies upon Christian people.
Jesus had two bibles he could have used. The Babylon Aramaic one that Strong used, or the Greek one made in 280BC. He used the Greek one and then he inspired the New Testament to be written in Greek.
The problem is, as Brother Owens and I have pointed out, is that the Apostles quoted from the Greek Jesus used, and when you look in the current KJV translated from the Aramaic you see they changed the Word of God. They add, they took away, they changed. But yet they tell us the lie the Aramaic Old Testament is the pure and unadulterated Word of God.
Jesus and the Apostles did not read from the Aramaic and they did not use that bible. Why should we.
So, when you use Strongs for the Old Testament, you are being guided to accept and use Babylonian Aramaic.
That is a big deception. No prophet, no bible writer before 300BC ever wrote anything in Babylon Aramaic. They translated everything around 300BC into Aramaic.
This is serious because the coming antichrist will use Aramaic as a means to deceive the nations.
If a stand is not taken now, many souls will be deceived.
My question to all those Apostolic's, Pentecostals, Apostolic Pentecostals, those that call themselves Jesus only. The question is too those; if you are "Jesus only" then why are you using man made name's for God?
ReplyDeleteJehovah was created in 1270 A.D. and Yahweh was created in the 1500s and etc. if those names were created in, which we can prove then why are we using these title man-made names for God?
Acts4:12 states that there was only one name given. One name. That one name for God is Jesus.
do not call yourselves Jesus only if you use these title names,
It's a shame when a Apostolic college uses a Trinitarian agenda and Trinitarian teachers to teach in there colleges, you might say when did these Apostolic colleges allow Trinitarians to teach in their classes? The answer to that is when they used the Strong's concordance. When they used the tetragramaton yhwh.
When they used Jehovah or when they used yhwh.
So don't claim your Jesus only if you use these books and these man-made titles. The man Ramondo's martini admitted creating Jehovah by using the vowels from Adonai and adding the kabbalistic Jewish mystical book YHWHto create Jehovah in his letter "daggers of faith".
It's time to make a stand and become 'Jesus only' the revealed name of God, the one and only name :Jesus!